Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#11
Originally Posted by cashclientel View Post
Evidence?durrrr, durrrr da da durrrr
there is no specs about receiver. so unless we get a proof of concept or something, the ir module is only for Tx
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
cashclientel's Avatar
Posts: 663 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ London, UK
#12
I see.

FYI Wikipedia (aka 'the truth' ) states that the N900 has an "Infrared transceiver".
__________________
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
 
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 14 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Mobile
#13
No IR receive seems very unusual. Mostly IR ports are designed to permitt IR communication between devices, which requires the ability to recieve. If it says 'IR port' is should be both tx and rx- otherwise it isnt really a 'port'. It should say 'transmitter' and not 'port' if there is no receiver.

I suspect the receiver is there, but perhaps undocumented.
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#14
Originally Posted by ogre View Post
No IR receive seems very unusual. Mostly IR ports are designed to permitt IR communication between devices, which requires the ability to recieve. If it says 'IR port' is should be both tx and rx- otherwise it isnt really a 'port'. It should say 'transmitter' and not 'port' if there is no receiver.

I suspect the receiver is there, but perhaps undocumented.
it isn't irda at the first place (no communication, only for Tx)
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#15
Originally Posted by ogre View Post
Mostly IR ports are designed to permitt IR communication between devices
But this IR port isn't for communication, it's for sending IR codes to TVs etc. Most remote controls only have IR transmitters too, and the N900 is just the same.
 
Posts: 692 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#16
I'd be really upset about the lack of a receiver if there was anything worth watching on TV these days I used to use OmniRemote on my Treo to copy TV remotes and stuff. My old Treo 180 was even better for this, it got much better range than the 650.
 
cashclientel's Avatar
Posts: 663 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ London, UK
#17
Why include an IR port if it is only a transmitter? The emitter is too low power to make it useful as a replacement for a normal remote control, thus it must be for device to device transfer.
__________________
Nokia are a business and have chosen a path of using the OSS community phenomenon to reduce their overheads specifically after sales support and development. Unlike Apple who do the opposite and make a killing from their Applications store.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:47.