|
2010-03-24
, 11:49
|
Posts: 432 |
Thanked: 645 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#22
|
[1] Actually, I noticed I added 'LIBS += lib/libQtLocation.so' rather than something like 'LIBS += -Llib', but it still seems to pick up the other libraries in their so I guess it's clever like that.
|
2010-03-24
, 11:56
|
Posts: 432 |
Thanked: 645 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#23
|
|
2010-03-24
, 12:14
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Campinas, SP, Brazil
|
#24
|
And followed the Mac instructions. I have a german tutorial here:
http://www.mobileqt.de/wiki/wie_man_...tor_integriert
|
2010-03-24
, 13:56
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#25
|
But have you got the code compiled, right?
Do you have the library installed on your device?
If this is a compiler issue, try to set the full path to your library in the pro file. This might work.l
|
2010-03-24
, 14:38
|
Posts: 432 |
Thanked: 645 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#26
|
What external libraries? The only libraries I'm using are Qt ones - they're just newer than the ones in Madde (and there are additional ones).
Right, but I'm not convinced my method is valid. IINM, I'm compiling the source using Qt 4.5.2 qmake, moc and includes (as well as the QtMobility includes), and linking with the Qt 4.6.2 libs and QtMobility libraries.
Only the Qt 4.6.2 and Mobility libs.
Well, I will check more deeply when I get home, but I think this is basically the same as if I change a library in a way that breaks the ABI, and so binaries linking with it will run, but crash when they call a methods that's been changed.
Anyway, I'll see when I get home. Thanks.
Max.
|
2010-03-24
, 18:50
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#27
|
With external libraries, I meant libraries, which are not part of the official rootstrap, no matter which ones.
Have you seen this post? There is as well MADDE mentioned, whith instructions on how to integrate 4.6 there.
|
2010-03-25
, 07:29
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#28
|
|
2010-06-01
, 04:35
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#29
|
|
2010-06-01
, 07:30
|
Posts: 432 |
Thanked: 645 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#30
|
Do you mean this as in "it's not officially supported", "it's not our primary/initial concern" or "it won't work"?
I understand the purpose of Qt Mobility and Qt in general, in terms of portability, but Qt+extensions can't cover everything. Specifically, the work I'm doing at my university involves a couple of libraries developed independently by members of our team (this, for one), and I'd be a bit concerned if the new SDK is designed in such a way that using those will be painful.
The Following User Says Thank You to danielwilms For This Useful Post: | ||
These are the hacks I made :
If someone has some indication of what might be wrong with this that would cause a run-time crash (my app just stops, without any 'crash dialog', so I'm not convinced it's dumping core), I'd love to hear suggestions.
Thanks!
Max.
PS. Why doesn't this 'list' icon on this forum work? It's supposed to put numbers on them, but I have to put them in manually...annoying
[1] Actually, I noticed I added 'LIBS += lib/libQtLocation.so' rather than something like 'LIBS += -Llib', but it still seems to pick up the other libraries in their so I guess it's clever like that.