![]() |
2010-03-31
, 10:46
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#82
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 11:04
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#83
|
Rushmore, I agree that there are a lot of things in this phone that people are surprised to not see, including portrait SMS.
On the other hand, back at when we speculated if it'd be a phone or not, I for one thought that Maemo 4 didn't bode well for a phone OS. With no phone functionality, no PIM, no anything that might make it an overlapping product with existing Nokia phones. I think for a "first phone", they did okay. There were lots of phone centric things that had to be designed from scratch. Which they do not have to do with Symbian phones.
So, I believe there are a lot of unrealistic expectations plus I am surprised they marketed it like they did - a "superphone". It was bound to create discontent. This is, for all purposes, a product directly comparable with the "Google Developer Phone"... In my opinion. You didn't see many end users running around with the first Android phone, and that was probably a wise marketing decision until they had it more ready for mass market.
Nokia jumped into it with the N900.
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 15:09
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#84
|
"Couple of hours work" haha! I'd like portrait SMS too, but it would take longer than that, I'm sure.
The Following User Says Thank You to maurelio79 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 16:21
|
|
Posts: 327 |
Thanked: 249 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
|
#85
|
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=136
Ok, maybe not 2 hours... on day? a couple of day? I mean it's so impossible to do? I can not belive it....
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 17:07
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#86
|
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 17:11
|
|
Posts: 327 |
Thanked: 249 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
|
#87
|
I know... i'm totaly agree with you, buuuut and again... is it impossible? i understand that there are more important things: but like we had portrait browser a little buggy for some months, we can also have portrait SMS a little buggy for some months and with our feedback help nokia to improve, am i wrong?
I do not understand problem with existing messages, it is only a gui: i'm speaking about rotate a window and rearrange the content.
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 20:24
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#88
|
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 20:31
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#89
|
![]() |
2010-03-31
, 21:10
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#90
|
for me that would be a nice step, to read the sms in portrait. the internal big screen.
![]() |
Tags |
disappointment imminent, search are the suck |
|
On the other hand, back at when we speculated if it'd be a phone or not, I for one thought that Maemo 4 didn't bode well for a phone OS. With no phone functionality, no PIM, no anything that might make it an overlapping product with existing Nokia phones. I think for a "first phone", they did okay. There were lots of phone centric things that had to be designed from scratch. Which they do not have to do with Symbian phones.
So, I believe there are a lot of unrealistic expectations plus I am surprised they marketed it like they did - a "superphone". It was bound to create discontent. This is, for all purposes, a product directly comparable with the "Google Developer Phone"... In my opinion. You didn't see many end users running around with the first Android phone, and that was probably a wise marketing decision until they had it more ready for mass market.
Nokia jumped into it with the N900.
Last edited by volt; 2010-03-31 at 08:18.