Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Jun 2008
#51
Wow. I'm underwhelmed.
 
Naranek's Avatar
Posts: 236 | Thanked: 149 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Finland
#52
Originally Posted by crown77 View Post
ohh yes multitasking was one of the major reasons for me to buy the n900 now there are not much really good arguments for the N900 beside the open source.
Funny - for me the open source is a huge reason, because the device is an actual multifunctional computer. But I understand that people have different motivations and reasons. Luckily there are good devices for both of us
 
Posts: 562 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Daly City
#53
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
You could allways quickly remove the battery....
lmao.. how are you going to do that on an iPhone?
 
juise-'s Avatar
Posts: 186 | Thanked: 192 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Finland
#54
Originally Posted by chase15 View Post
lmao.. how are you going to do that on an iPhone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFcslxugVZI
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#55
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
Strange that Iphone 3G gets iPhone OS 4.0 update (sans multitasking), but the original iPhone doesn't. They have same CPU, RAM, GPU etc.

Wonder how much crying that will cause.
how long since the 3G got launched? the usual at&t contract length is 2 years, right?
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#56
I think my iPod touch is running at 532 MHz. Both my n810 and my n800 multi-task just fine at 400 MHz with a very, very similar CPU and a much heavier OS, and Apple doesn't consider the iPod touch 2G psuedo multi-tasking worthy? They are truly software pussies.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#57
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
I think my iPod touch is running at 532 MHz. Both my n810 and my n800 multi-task just fine at 400 MHz with a very, very similar CPU and a much heavier OS, and Apple doesn't consider the iPod touch 2G psuedo multi-tasking worthy? They are truly software pussies.
I've concluded that the thing about Apple is that if they can't implement it in a fashion where the functionality will not harm the perception of Apple products then they will choose to omit it until they can either get it working or until people forget about it (with the help of marketing).

For example, cut/copy and paste, multi-tasking, etc..It's likely that they don't want the perception of Apple products to be poor at say multi-tasking so instead of letting users try it out themselves and learn that it's a bad idea to run X many heavy apps at once they rather just not let them do it at all.

Part of that is why I can never own an Apple product. If I did I would constantly be fighting against their walls (e.g. jailbreaking) which as we can see Apple is more than willing to play the cat and mouse game with jailbreakers.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Posts: 193 | Thanked: 61 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#58
i saw a tweet saying the N900 could have a premature death because of this "so called" multi-tasking on the iPhone.

I laughed!
 
Posts: 41 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#59
Of course he thinks it is good. Because now iphone users can be flooded with pop up ads from the ad company that Apple bought.
In fact Jobs says he thinks he can be serving up to 1 billion ads per day.

IAds coming to a Iphone near you.
Apple having complete control over your device and content even better.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/mu...-1225851788118
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#60
Let's not forget the difference in price points and value for money.

Here in Canada,
The N900 sells for $570.
The 3G sells for $600.
The iPhone 3GS in currently priced at $700/$800 for the 16/32GB version.

At that pricing, the two 3GS models are 23% and 40% more expensive than the N900, respectively.


Once iPhone 4.0 hits, it will likely replace the 3GS in pricing, which will take the place of 3G. By that time, the N900 will be even cheaper.

For reference, today 1 USD = 1.00139 CAD

Last edited by stas123; 2010-04-09 at 04:36.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23.