![]() |
2010-04-12
, 07:48
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 08:08
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 08:32
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#4
|
Basically based on freewill and people doing stuff without getting any pay.
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 08:53
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#5
|
....
e: I myself use hours per week to packagetesting. I get no credit for it here (except karma) and all I can read from tmo is constant whine, btching, rants, provocative threads.
I paid pretty big premium from my N900 (about 630eur), and I have received no money for any of my work contributed to maemo.org.
....
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 09:19
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#6
|
I use my n900 on a daily basis and if it was not for people like you volunteering your time then the n900 would be of limited use.
I want to say thank-you ossipena for all your efforts.
If you anyone is unhappy with their n900 then follow ossipena's example and do something positive about it.
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 09:35
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Finland
|
#7
|
exactly. what's the point to whine to thousands of these people and hope the couple nokia employers here will react.
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 09:51
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#8
|
However, the original argument wasn't that Nokia would read the biatching and moaning on here and directly react to that by fixing the N900 - but rather that a sufficient amount of moaning would make potential buyers reconsider their purchase, thus prompting Nokia to do (...)
![]() |
2010-04-12
, 10:32
|
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 192 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Finland
|
#9
|
a sufficient amount of moaning would make potential buyers reconsider their purchase, thus prompting Nokia to do one or many of the following:
Some people disagree with this and I ran into a pretty eloquent comment about it on reddit. Here's the tl;dr:
"If you want a feature X on a platform, *****ing about X en masse is an effective way to hurt the company just enough for it to provide X for you. So, *****ing is a good negative reinforcement."
I didn't write this, so you should be aware that I'm just reiterating and linking to it.
The thread does make one very good example though: When Sony had its rootkit -fiasco, it wasn't enough to just not buy Sony's products - we had to raise hell (and awareness) about it and only then did they agree to pull the functionality alltogether.
Same goes, I think, for the N900 (since it's the product I own): If there's something fundamentally wrong about it, it's by no means useless to ***** about it.
Here's the link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/c...t_dont_buy_it/
Read about my N900 experiences from my blog.