![]() |
2010-04-24
, 08:41
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#3292
|
UP_THRESHOLD=75 SAMPLING_RATE=150000 VDD1_OPPS_VSEL="30 20 25 30 33 38 45 45 48 48 54 54 60 67 72" DSP_OPPS_RATE="90 90 180 360 400 430 430 430 430 500 500 500 500 520 520" MIN_FREQ=500000 MAX_FREQ=850000 SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0 SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
@ 125 MHz | @ 250MHz Run #1 Run #2 | Run #1 Run #2 306 308 | 456 462 4033 4036 | 4012 4012 124800 124800 | 249600 249600 2 2 | 3 3 2 2 | 3 3 ---------------------------------- @ 500MHz | @ 850 MHz Run #1 Run #2 | Run #1 Run #2 700 684 | 1279 1276 4020 4017 | 3996 3993 500000 500000 | 849920 849920 4 4 | 10 10 3 3 | 3 3
EDIT:
500MHz seems to be most efficient frequency from power consumption point (least uW/Hz), 850MHz is quite close too. In-line what egoshin said earlier.EDIT2:
Based on this information, I'll do more idle trials during nightimes to find out if 500MHz (fixed, single freq) is also best when low load.
Based on graph below (snapshots from Battery-eye), there seems to a small advantage to use both 125MHz and 500MHz instead of only 500MHz. Difference is not too big.Some screen captures in Battery consumption analysis thread, post #211.
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 10:00
|
|
Posts: 324 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#3293
|
Thank you so much for your help, I have been trying to flash to lv,ulv or xlv settings. But for some reason it doesnt flash to those settings or I am not noticing any differance. I am not not sure if I am doing something wrong but, I enter
/usr/sbin/kernel-load /usr/share/kernel-power-settings/lv
Then I check the Conky and I dont see any changes? it doesnt seem to be any different than stock settings.
The Following User Says Thank You to matts76 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 11:14
|
|
Posts: 324 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#3295
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to matts76 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 14:10
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#3296
|
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 16:57
|
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ United Kingdom
|
#3297
|
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 17:11
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#3298
|
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 18:11
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#3299
|
![]() |
2010-04-24
, 19:11
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#3300
|
Sorry ive just read ur post properly, i guess thats the problem with posting on the fly, ive now edited my post to 850mhz, hope the guy didn't use it as it was, although i think it would just not work set outside of the available freqs...... confirmed
I've been clocking all the way up to 1.15ghz and its been rock solid, although i never leave it so high for long just to play psx4all, i use ideal settings for browsing and when i need a bit more speed, and underclock 250-500 for idle (still struggling to make 125 stick)
all in all ive had nothing but positive results, with a few tweaks im now getting much improved battery life and have had zero overheating or data curuption, (i think im one of the lucky ones with a super chip)
![]() |
|
I also know that you can run echo 125000 250000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/avoid_frequencies or somthing along those lines which prevents this reset from happening, but only until I reboot.
my question is, any way to permanently lock minimum @500MHz?