Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
Matan is offline Matan
2010-04-28 , 14:57
Posts: 1,224 | Thanked: 1,763 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#11
It's probably 10$ per device, capped at 100$ a year or something like that, just like the Novel deal. This way Microsoft gets the PR that another Linux distributor licensed their "patents that Linux infringes on", while the distributor gets a very cheap insurance policy.
__________________
My repository

"N900 community support for the MeeGo-Harmattan" Is the new "Mer is Fremantle for N810".

No more Nokia devices for me.
 
johnel is offline johnel
2010-04-28 , 15:01
Posts: 999 | Thanked: 1,117 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ earth?
#12
Can I assume that this type of patent "licensing" only applies to the US?

Can Microsoft do this to Nokia?
__________________
I like cake.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Texrat is offline Texrat
2010-04-28 , 15:12
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#13
Originally Posted by rm42 View Post
The deal specifically mentions Android, in other words Linux.
That still doesn't answer the question "why just HTC?".

Of course, this could be a piecemeal process and HTC was just the first to fold...

Originally Posted by johnel View Post
Can Microsoft do this to Nokia?
Microsoft and Nokia have an interesting relationship: comeptitors in some places, collaborators in others. I'm sure both tread carefully with each other when it comes to IP...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Last edited by Texrat; 2010-04-28 at 15:14.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
matthewcc is offline matthewcc
2010-04-28 , 15:14
Posts: 267 | Thanked: 128 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Somerville MA - USA
#14
First any discussion at this point to what the licensing deal is in regards to is speculation.

There is nothing wrong with licensing MS Tech and layering it on to Android or any other product if it makes it better for the consumers. What in the end is more important is how it is used and if HTC can create a new patent about how it leverages the MS tech in coordination with its own tech cheers for them. That is innovation. Sometimes it makes sense to buy over building from scratch especially when considering how important time to market is in this space.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to matthewcc For This Useful Post:
fatalsaint is offline fatalsaint
2010-04-28 , 15:15
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#15
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
That still doesn't answer the question "why just HTC?".

Of course, this could be a piecemeal process and HTC was just the first to fold...
The other thing that has me going "Huh?" is that the only part of "Linux" that is in Android is the kernel only.

I haven't read through all of Microsofts bull ****, of course, but are any of the patents related to the actual 'kernel' of linux?

One of these days I really ought to care more... but I just don't. Even if microsoft wins it won't stop Linux. It's a futile effort.
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
rm42's Avatar
rm42 is offline rm42
2010-04-28 , 15:38
Posts: 963 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Connecticut, USA
#16
Originally Posted by matthewcc View Post
First any discussion at this point to what the licensing deal is in regards to is speculation.

There is nothing wrong with licensing MS Tech and layering it on to Android or any other product if it makes it better for the consumers. What in the end is more important is how it is used and if HTC can create a new patent about how it leverages the MS tech in coordination with its own tech cheers for them. That is innovation. Sometimes it makes sense to buy over building from scratch especially when considering how important time to market is in this space.
The problem I see with all of these Microsoft patent deals related to Linux is that the specific technology being targeted is not mentioned. There are several problems with this. First of all, we need to remember that most Linux software is licensed under the GPL license which specifically precludes the use of discriminatory patent licensing. So, are Linux copyright holders rights being respected? And second, it creates an atmosphere of FUD around the use of Linux which can dampen its adoption.

PS: And yes, that includes Meego!
__________________
-- Worse than not knowing is not wanting to know! --

http://temporaryland.wordpress.com/
Last edited by rm42; 2010-04-28 at 15:59.
 
wmarone is offline wmarone
2010-04-28 , 15:47
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#17
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
are any of the patents related to the actual 'kernel' of linux?
Microsoft would like you to believe there is, and either not use the Linux kernel (instead use something like BSD, which they can take from freely without ever giving back) or pay them royalties.

They claim to hold patents on the kernel and have used this to squeeze royalties out of companies but never say what they might be, because the moment the kernel community knew they would either remove them from the kernel or would dig up prior art and move to have them voided. Other times they hold patents on ridiculous crap (VFAT long file names) or use patents to their monopolistic advantage (exFAT.)

Originally Posted by rm42 View Post
And second, it creates an atmosphere of FUD around the use of Linux which can dampen its adoption.
Which is exactly what Microsoft wants.

Just don't forget: Microsoft hates it when you don't choose them, so they'll work to remove all other choices. And then they'll say you chose them.


(No, I don't like Microsoft.)
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
sjgadsby is offline sjgadsby
2010-04-28 , 15:53
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#18
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
That still doesn't answer the question "why just HTC?".

Of course, this could be a piecemeal process and HTC was just the first to fold...
Going after one patent infringer at a time, building a case, isn't unusual, and since HTC licenses Windows Mobile, there may have been extra leverage available.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
matthewcc is offline matthewcc
2010-04-28 , 15:58
Posts: 267 | Thanked: 128 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Somerville MA - USA
#19
Originally Posted by rm42 View Post
It creates an atmosphere of FUD around the use of Linux which can dampen its adoption.
You are right - but rather than focus on the use of existing (un-named) IP- I am more interested in how it can affect the creation of net-new IP. The more I think of this topic I am beginning to believe that existing IP is just the building block of new IP.

Think about music and Danger Mouse's Grey album. The concept was that by taking existing music (ip) and using it in a new, innovative and unique way that it resulted in a new work that was outside of copyright of its constituent parts.

Now art and technology are different mediums with different IP laws that are applied to them. BUT collaboration and cross pollination will result in something new, different and (hopefully) better. But in order to drive innovation we need to respect the work of others, and allow them to profit off of their work - while not stopping new innovation.

That line is the most difficult to manage, and I surely do not have a solution there.
 
Freemantle is offline Freemantle
2010-04-28 , 16:01
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 44 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#20
Any chance that there's a little bit of hysteria spreading here over Linux and how big bad microsoft is once again trampling on our freedoms?

is it possible (as has been muted) that since HTC built their company on windows mobile, microsoft have somehow got a stake in the hardware side of the operation instead of the software. Possibly (and speculatory) HTC phones have used, and still use (regardless of OS) patented microsoft tech. In which case, nothing to worry about, just another business deal.
 
Reply
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:43.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top