Reply
Thread Tools
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#41
Originally Posted by bandora View Post
Please, don't buy a Nokia anymore.. it won't satisfy you.. Go with android or somewhere else, in the meantime we will enjoy Nokia products.. kthnxbye..
And this is a GREAT strategy. Keep telling that to people. I'm sure you'll eventually succeed in having your own exclusive club of people who only like what you like. Do you work for Nokia's marketing? Or are you an executive? Just a feeling.

Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
This thread has lost the plot. IMPOSSIBLE to do a fair review on a p.type anything. anyone moaning about the current status of N900 and moaning about Nokia are soon going eat their words. The much waited update is coming soon and from what i read on here from everyone downing the N900 will soon very regret their words especially the poor sods that have sold there's. STOP GRIPING AND MOANING ...WAIT LIKE THE REST OF US AND ENJOY FUTURE PLANS FOR N900. You lot have got either no brain cells or are just plain i want i want and i want it now . A very childish attitude to have.
It's coming alright. Like the Great Prophet Zarquon. "Did I make it in time?" ZZzzt!

Let's hope it doesn't arrive JUST in time for its end too, hmm?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#42
Originally Posted by h3llraz0r View Post
Like I said, fails to understand.
how hard it is to understand that release date of PR1.2 hasn't been announced but it has been officially announced (and PR1.3 also if I haven't understood something wrong)
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#43
It will be interesting to see what Apple has to offer as iPhone 4. Probably next 7th of June they will release it.
iPhone 4 and Nokia N8 will be compared alot. Right now IMHO it seems very good for N8. The camera is the best currently in mobile phones, HDMI-interface is nice, USB OTG is nice, ....

What matters alot, is the GUI in N8. There are alot of changes in Symbian^3 compared to old S60-platforms. Single click instead of double click, pinch zoom; all those things which made iPhone popular. Nokia better not have bugs in the UI when N8 is available.

GUI speed of responses is the main reason why Apple hasn't supported multitasking in current iPhone models.
It probably wouldn't hurt, if there would be at least two schedlulers for multitasking; for basic users which want maximum speed in UI sacrificing abit flexible multitasking, and then those advanced usees, who do not care if UI lags abit as long multitasking is smooth and background processes get all their needed CPU-time. "UI schedluler" and "Multitaskin schedluler" could be changed in the settings.

Overall, with N8, I think Nokia is on its way back to the top.

Still, I prefer N900 due to its Linux-compatibility. I hope Nokia will release once a year a Linux (Meego) phone which has all the currently reasonable latest hardware features. (But of course be compatible with the previous Linux phones.)

Last edited by zimon; 2010-04-29 at 10:01.
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#44
Once a year, a new Linux phone.. and orphanage for the previous models. Let's show them how we can screw up open-source! Status quo! Here, here!
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#45
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
symbian kicks meego's *** with eyes closed and hands chained when not talking about top of the line HW.
I beg to differ. Even at the low end of the spectrum (OMAP 1710), OS2005 on the 770 was infinitely better than SymbianOS on the N70 or similar devices of the time.
 
Bec's Avatar
Posts: 876 | Thanked: 396 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#46
Only reason that holds me from switching is the full flash support we have
-the very advanced browser
-the firefox browser
-and the linux apps
-the openness of maemo/meego
-the modding and overclocking
-and this community that still remains great even with posts like this one
__________________
 
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Sheffield, England.
#47
the n900 is awesome, I don't think any phone in the market at the moment could satisfy me better.. being a comp sci student I can understand its true potential.

Though I agree that nokia is messing up, it has the resources and they should have been able to do a much better job. But from the looks of it they are really putting sales and customer satisfaction secondary to sales and marketing.

The n900 still is in demand, i personally know quite a few ppl who are waiting for this phone to be released in their respective countries to get their hands on it.. I just hope Nokia has a better strategy in store. =)
__________________
I <3 my N900..!
 
Posts: 308 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ UK Swindon
#48
^^^ I agree. Developer phone my arse. It wasn't sold as that back in september when Nokia released the pre-orders.

The fact that its sold (or was) as a smart phone is shocking. As a smart phone its a piece of crap. As an internet device that can run as a computer, its a seriously powerful lump of plastic. Doesn't make it a good user experience though.

I along with 3 others from work have now sold the n900 and move to android via desire/G N1.

Nokia should concentrate on making 1 OS that works in the smartphone market. First time. HTC have. Why can't Nokia?? Other OS's ie meego or whatever its called this week are fine for specialist devices but don't try to bolt on bits that don't work very well and sell it as something its not.

All you fanboys and "you're a troll" groupies shoot me down. Its fact of matter. Hands up how many of you have admitted to carrying their previous phones too.....

Point made.

Last edited by bonerp; 2010-04-29 at 12:07.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bonerp For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#49
Originally Posted by bonerp View Post
Nokia should concentrate on making 1 OS that works in the smartphone market. First time. HTC have. Why can't Nokia??
For the record, HTC supports two major platforms (WinMo and Android), just like Nokia (Symbian and Maemo). In fact, HTC's WinMo involvement is probably one the reasons they now have to pay license fees to Microsoft for selling Android devices.

EDIT: Scratch that, HTC supports *three* platforms, I forgot Brew (HTC Smart)
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc

Last edited by attila77; 2010-04-29 at 13:46.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#50
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
For the record, HTC supports two major platforms (WinMo and Android), just like Nokia (Symbian and Maemo). In fact, HTC's WinMo involvement is probably one the reasons they now have to pay license fees to Microsoft for selling Android devices.

EDIT: Scratch that, HTC supports *three* platforms, I forgot Brew (HTC Smart)
Thank you for pointing this out. Some people want to bash Nokia so much they let simple things like facts get in the way of their arguments
 

The Following User Says Thank You to nosa101 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
bad mojo, h3ll100ser, ignorant thread, raised nothing, sigh, worst thread


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:29.