![]() |
2010-05-09
, 21:09
|
|
Posts: 1,338 |
Thanked: 1,055 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ California, USA / Jordan
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-05-09
, 21:10
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-05-09
, 21:12
|
|
Posts: 1,338 |
Thanked: 1,055 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ California, USA / Jordan
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-05-09
, 21:31
|
Posts: 37 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#5
|
I am very surprised with this attitude.
Since the n900 has a good hardware to do something, I don't see a reason why it should have a weak software linked to this part of hardware.
For example, about the missing functionnalities for phone calls, some people explain the n900 is a computer, and it does not have to be a good phone.
I think all actual phones are computers, some of them much less powerful than n900, and they can do some things the n900 cannot.
I agree writing software is long and difficult, but that is not a reason for which the n900 SHOULD NOT do something.
The reason for which most people buy this sort of device is the ability to do lots of different things, using a unique small and light device.
My N900 contains a good camera, a good phone, a good computer whit good network capacities, and many other good device parts.
My dream is, all these components could be as well exploited as possible, giving me the choice if I want to install the applications for a task or another.
For example, the IR emitter can give a better result than an expensive multimedia remote. Why such a task should not be possible, only because the n900 can do other things ?
I would like to use my n900 for desktop tasks (printing, scanning, using a bluetooth keyboard and mouse), for geek tasks (nmap, ssh...), for taking good pictures, to make and advanced use of the phone, for playing (bounce + tv out is very impressive), etc.
Let the people choose how they want to live with their n900 and stop saying it is not supposed to bethis or that !