![]() |
2007-08-08
, 22:38
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#12
|
![]() |
2007-08-08
, 22:51
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#13
|
Damn, I was polite???
...
I blame the diplomatic face I had to put on earlier today...
EDIT: the editor continues his streak of disingenuity in the annotated comments. Let's see how far he's willing to run with that trait...
![]() |
2007-08-08
, 22:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#14
|
![]() |
2007-08-08
, 23:13
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#15
|
![]() |
2007-08-08
, 23:28
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#16
|
![]() |
2007-08-08
, 23:46
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#17
|
![]() |
2007-08-09
, 04:03
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#18
|
Mine isn't appearing
Maybe he's cottoned on to us and knows he's getting an orchestrated pasting.
I had some serious points to make (well, I thought they were serious)... the quality of the reporting in that article is flat out poor, and unfortunately we all come across sounding like Nokia fanbois (which we undeniably are) yet the point we're trying to make to the guy is that this article is factually incorrect on a number of fundamental points!
Sooooo annoying.... grrrrrr.
![]() |
2007-08-09
, 06:30
|
|
Posts: 729 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#19
|
![]() |
2007-08-09
, 13:01
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#20
|
[edit] Oops. This erroneous message was sponsored by Firefox and NoScript, our favorite add-on.
Last edited by tfinnan; 2007-08-08 at 22:39.