![]() |
2010-05-20
, 21:43
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Brazil
|
#11
|
![]() |
2010-05-21
, 08:23
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#12
|
![]() |
2010-05-21
, 08:57
|
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#13
|
![]() |
2010-05-21
, 09:28
|
Posts: 402 |
Thanked: 229 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Missouri, USA
|
#14
|
![]() |
2010-05-21
, 12:30
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Brazil
|
#15
|
Does that mean you can simply compile programs on the desktop and zip them across? if that is the case, wont programs be a slow cos they're not compiled for the N900 cpu?
![]() |
2010-05-30
, 19:41
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#16
|
Are you running the distros in a virtual machine, from a LiveCD or straight off of your hard drive? The former two will always be slower. In that case I'd suggest running something like openbox which is light weight and eat less resources than full DE's.
If it helps, I'm running ArchLinux with WMII, but even under KDE 4.4 it didn't take "a few seconds" for menu items to load.
[edit]
I don't think it has anything to do with the graphics drivers. I just downgraded to vesa drivers and Qt was still as responsive as ever.
![]() |
2010-05-31
, 06:04
|
Posts: 402 |
Thanked: 229 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Missouri, USA
|
#17
|
python -m SimpleHTTPServer