Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 52 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Washington, DC
#61
Originally Posted by superg05 View Post
wrong its the handset manufactures and carriers not Google they make it put it out its up to handset manufactures to implement it as Google said we make it and release it it not our job to hold peoples hands
Right.... So Meego is putting out a version of their software, and it is up to the "handset manufacturers" (in this case Nokia) to do the work to implement it for their specific device.

The situation isn't any different.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to switchfiend For This Useful Post:
Posts: 999 | Thanked: 1,117 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ earth?
#62
After reading the post at the beginning of the thread I was gutted.

However, two things spring to mind:
(1) Nokia has never announced an official MeeGo port to the n900
(2) MeeGo is more open source than maemo will ever be.


If we assume that Nokia's "No MeeGo for the n900" means no commercial apps (e.g. skpe, facebook, OVI maps) or Nokia livery (e.g. Nokia logo on startup) then maybe it is not as bad as it sounds.

Maemo's underpinnings is not open source in the slightest. GPS, phone and battery management software is closed-source. You cannot even write a new "phone" app because the "driver" and application are the same thing(?). Not as if you can link your custom phone app to a library and make phone calls.

Non-offical MeeGo seems to be progressing well. As far as I know the MeeGo team are having problems with the battery management and I think they have developed an open source phone library. Most of the work is done. When the foundation is complete any UI can be installed on the top of it.

As long as all the hardware of the n900 is working with MeeGo then there is a good chance a community-based "n900 Linux distro" can be developed and maintained.

If this is the case then Nokia have just "shot themselves in the head" and removed their relevance from MeeGo and any decent chance of a proper "smartphone".

The key thing here is as long as there is an open sourced stack that enables the hardware for the n900 then we can use the device as we see fit.

When Nokia do release a new device based on MeeGo would you seriously recommend it to anyone based on your experiences with the n900?

I would say no and would be unlikely I would buy a "premium" device from Nokia again.
__________________
I like cake.

Last edited by johnel; 2010-05-25 at 08:07.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 44 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Switzerland
#63
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Or are their more updates scheduled for Maemo5 after PR1.2?
If I correctly read between the lines there's more updates coming to Maemo5.

I also don't understand why everyone (almost) expected that there should be Maemo6/MeeGo for N900?

1) MeeGo apps will work on N900 whatever OS it's running
2) Maemo is going to have updates and enhancements
3) there's probably going to be unofficial port of MeeGo for the adventurous anyway

I don't deny that I would have been happier if Nokia made end user MeeGo for N900 also, but in the end it's really not that important considering the reasons above. First MeeGo HW is coming out in the end of the year, so N900 is 1 year old already, surely geegs need a new HW fix every year anyway.
 
Posts: 124 | Thanked: 52 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Sweden
#64
No Meego for the N900?

ok. i can put up with that - AS LONG as we will keep getting new Driver updates for a long time to come (or maybe even open source drivers) AND also OS optimizations (speed, reliability and features) for Maemo.

If it turns out that Meego will be blazingly fast (with lower overhead) and total eyecandy with high framerate and NO VSYNC display problems on hardware with the same SoC as the N900 (OMAP3430)... then we should expect equal improvements and speed optimizations for Maemo. Otherwise it will be a big dissappointment.

i remember vividly how the previous tablets got big updates year after year.
 
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#65
 

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#66
It seems to me cycles are speeding up and obsolescence is coming faster. The N810 was darned near drowned in the N900 hoopla. I would expect there to be even more hoopla over the first MeeGo devices, so I would expect more drowning.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,751 | Thanked: 844 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Sweden
#67
Originally Posted by Arpa View Post
If I correctly read between the lines there's more updates coming to Maemo5.

I also don't understand why everyone (almost) expected that there should be Maemo6/MeeGo for N900?

1) MeeGo apps will work on N900 whatever OS it's running
2) Maemo is going to have updates and enhancements
3) there's probably going to be unofficial port of MeeGo for the adventurous anyway

I don't deny that I would have been happier if Nokia made end user MeeGo for N900 also, but in the end it's really not that important considering the reasons above. First MeeGo HW is coming out in the end of the year, so N900 is 1 year old already, surely geegs need a new HW fix every year anyway.
Because Nokia have said that Harmattan will be released but not under the name Maemo6.
 
Posts: 1,086 | Thanked: 2,964 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#68
Ahh .. the old "bury a bit of bad news" (MeeGo) "with some good news" (1.2), the oldest trick in marketing

Speaking of marketing..
Originally Posted by Peter@Maemo Marketing View Post
Let's remember that this all about user experience. Polishing software is a lot of work. Polishing each application for resistive screen (as good as it is) is not trivial considering that we are making the UI for our Nokia product on MeeGo for capacitive screens as we have said already in Maemo Summit 2009.
Riiight.. so what's going to stop every other developer taking the same attitude. I mean, if polishing software is too much work for Nokia with their huge workforce and $$$, how is Joe Bloggs going to manage it with his Qt app? All Im saying is, that from a n900 owners standpoint, it does make a difference if Nokia takes the lead in this.

Sure we have Qt, but the developer of the app still needs to target and compile it for Maemo5. Fast forward, how long will it be before the standard Qt app starts off as a capacitive screen targeted app?

We've seen MeeGo on TVs, netbooks, shopping kiosks and heard it mentioned even for things without a screen. The only difference is it was Intel showing those off

Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Please notice this thread:

N900 community support for the future MeeGo based release from Nokia
Go Go Gadget Community!
__________________
Follow me on my neglected twitter @kojacker

Cybot950 - Control a robot with your N9/N950
SMSPetFeeder - Build a Bluetooth/SMS dog feeder with Qt, N950, and arduino
Nerf950 - Use your N9/N950 to fire a Nerf gun

Last edited by kojacker; 2010-05-25 at 09:00.
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#69
Originally Posted by kojacker View Post
Ahh .. the old "bury a bit of bad news" (MeeGo) "with some good news" (1.2), the oldest trick in marketing

Speaking of marketing..

Riiight.. so what's going to stop every other developer taking the same attitude. I mean, if polishing software is too much work for Nokia with their huge workforce and $$$, how is Joe Bloggs going to manage it with his Qt app?

Sure we have Qt, but the developer of the app still needs to target and compile it for Maemo5. Fast forward, how long will it be before the standard Qt app starts off as a capacitive screen targeted app?

We've seen MeeGo on TVs, netbooks, shopping kiosks and heard it mentioned even for things without a screen. The only difference is it was Intel showing those off
Compiling is as easy as clicking a checkbox
 
Posts: 999 | Thanked: 1,117 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ earth?
#70
I think many people's problems is that Nokia are very, very bad at communicating with their customers (e.g. until recently the "uncertainty" with "PR1.2").

Maemo is not really open source (e.g. a few closed components).

Also it appears that the n900 will not get the "free" version of OVI maps. It's really frustrating watching the Nokia adverts on the t.v. knowing all Nokia customers can get OVI maps except you.

At least with MeeGo on the n900 I have a chance to own an open source device (in the true sense of the word).

When Nokia abandon the n900 then at least MeeGo will still be developed within the community.

QT will really help too. I can write a python-based QT app and run it on my LInux desktop, MS Windows and my n900 running maemo - without modification.
__________________
I like cake.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
dejavu, egocentric, premonition, wegot1newloser


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53.