The Following User Says Thank You to AtteK0 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-27
, 18:40
|
|
Posts: 1,296 |
Thanked: 1,773 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Budapest, Hungary
|
#2
|
Nokia is leaving Maemo 5
N900 is an expensive device and will not be receiving an official copy of the new generation of mobile OS.
That means Maemo is dead
and we will probably have to stick with it for the rest of the lifetime of our N900s
Nokia and Intel collaboration means that as soon as Intel publishes X86 based mobile processors (aka "Moorestown"). The high-end devices of Nokia will probably be going that way too
Hardware issues are a bit of a letdown, too.
However in the capitalistic world no company is foolish enough to try to satisfy old customers.
|
2010-05-27
, 19:06
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#3
|
This is not true.
This is not true.
This is not true.
This is not true.
No, it doesn't mean that. At least not in the foreseeable future.
This is not true.
The Following User Says Thank You to timwatt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-27
, 19:16
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#4
|
However in the capitalistic world no company is foolish enough to try to satisfy old customers.
|
2010-05-27
, 19:30
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#5
|
Business 101: It is 10x more expensive to sell to a new customer than to an existing one. Look it up.
Nokia has been around for a long time and realizes the importance of lifetime relationships with its customers. While the open source arena is new to them, they do have a solid record of customer support and consistent manufacture quality (at least for hardware).
|
2010-05-27
, 19:37
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#6
|
|
2010-05-27
, 23:01
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#7
|
I don't get the logic here. Attracting a new customer costs SIGNIFICANTLY more in marketing, which was my point. Now, if we are talking about developing a new software platform (i.e. Meego), I would agree that the majority of the cost is R&D.
I just think if we are discussing capitalism - the point of which is to make money - that Nokia would be foolish to ignore its current customer base. Purely speculation here, but its seems that the investment in the Ovi Suite, Qt compatibility, and the Yahoo partnership are targeted at this objective.
|
2010-05-27
, 23:27
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#8
|
Ironically, I've had the opinion for awhile that Nokia is burning its current customer-base (serious lack of store-front presence for support, repairs, parts, accessories, etc.). I don't trust shipping things all over God's creation and waiting a month or more to get a device back that I depend on--much less do it all without a ticket or a receipt as an assurance that it's been received into their possession for the intended purpose.
|
2010-05-28
, 00:25
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#9
|
I don't get the logic here. Attracting a new customer costs SIGNIFICANTLY more in marketing, which was my point. Now, if we are talking about developing a new software platform (i.e. Meego), I would agree that the majority of the cost is R&D.
|
2010-05-28
, 00:41
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#10
|
I just think if we are discussing capitalism - the point of which is to make money - that Nokia would be foolish to ignore its current customer base. Purely speculation here, but its seems that the investment in the Ovi Suite, Qt compatibility, and the Yahoo partnership are targeted at this objective.
Nokia is leaving Maemo 5 and going for MeeGo. N900 is an expensive device and will not be receiving an official copy of the new generation of mobile OS. That means Maemo is dead and we will probably have to stick with it for the rest of the lifetime of our N900s. I could believe in the might of the superdevelopers and Nokia tweaking the MeeGo for N900 but I am not getting my hopes up.
Reason 1: Nokia and Intel collaboration means that as soon as Intel publishes X86 based mobile processors (aka "Moorestown"). The high-end devices of Nokia will probably be going that way too
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06...atom_handsets/)
Reason 2: Programmers pushing out fairly good code, fixing bugs developing etc. is expensive. Why would Nokia bother itself with a device with no future markets except selling us the next gen (aka Harmattan)?
Reason 3: Hardware issues are a bit of a letdown, too. MeeGo will be an OS designed to take advantage multitouch. No luck there if you own an N900.
And the main reason: If you buy something that is not complete and Nokia gets the cash for it, they would have no oblication to fix it if that was not promised. When I bought the device I saw great potential for future (the rumored 10.1 prototype-video). However in the capitalistic world no company is foolish enough to try to satisfy old customers.
On the other hand we are getting updates (buggy ones) which is a nice thing. Nokia understands that we are a large group of people willing to buy a next MeeGo/Harmattan phone when it is published. IF we are happy with the last one.
The competition in the high-end mobile phone market is also going to be tougher for Nokia. There are many new trends to follow, new companies (Acer, LG) and OS` to fight against. Next generation is coming (over 10MB cameras, HD screens, HDMI out, WiFi N etc) and N900 is over 6 months old already.
I am going to enjoy my device as long as it lasts. A full Linux in my pocket is something great, not to mention the cellural capabilites and other gadgets.
No hard feelings, Nokia