![]() |
2010-05-29
, 11:24
|
Posts: 539 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Berlin, Germany
|
#92
|
What law? Can you please cite the statute or common law precedence?
I thought about a class action over the cost of a text times the number of phones, but even then, the average marginal cost is low since most people have an unlimited plan, so call it $0.05. Times maybe 500k phones that updated and damages to the class are $25,000 - not worth a lawfirm's time.
Regarding the privacy violations, I haven't checked, but I'm betting that nokia's privacy policy states that they may collect a large swath of information. Even if it doesn't, intangible damages like loss of privacy of a number are very hard to monetize, so again, I don't think anyone is going to go after nokia, legally.
I agree with the sentiment that this is the wrong ply on Nokia's part, but i think that it really just comes down to is this enough to make your next smartphone purchase not be nokia?
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 14:14
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#93
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crashdamage For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 14:46
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ New York City
|
#94
|
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 14:51
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#95
|
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 15:28
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#96
|
Sorry to step in here but Nokia didn't break any laws.
(....)
'm sure a massive corporation such as Nokia has adequate policies and safeguards and would not sell on your data and risk bad publicity.
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 15:54
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#97
|
![]() |
2010-05-30
, 13:54
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#99
|
![]() |
2010-05-30
, 14:47
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#100
|
I thought about a class action over the cost of a text times the number of phones, but even then, the average marginal cost is low since most people have an unlimited plan, so call it $0.05. Times maybe 500k phones that updated and damages to the class are $25,000 - not worth a lawfirm's time.
Regarding the privacy violations, I haven't checked, but I'm betting that nokia's privacy policy states that they may collect a large swath of information. Even if it doesn't, intangible damages like loss of privacy of a number are very hard to monetize, so again, I don't think anyone is going to go after nokia, legally.
I agree with the sentiment that this is the wrong ply on Nokia's part, but i think that it really just comes down to is this enough to make your next smartphone purchase not be nokia?