![]() |
2010-06-02
, 16:23
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#52
|
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 16:24
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#53
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dragly For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 16:27
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#54
|
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 16:30
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#55
|
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 22:26
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#56
|
I'm actually seeing this myself from time to time. When I think about it, this might be a problem caused by the constant autofocusing, although I remember having seen this some time ago as well. Maybe we should wait until the previous image has been decoded before calling autofocus again, just to make sure it does not get called again and again when the autofocus is temporarily causing the image to be out of focus?
Or would it be better to wait for the autofocus' success signal before calling the decoders at all? A simple way would be to set a "bool readyForDecode" to true whenever the autofocus callback returns with success and to false whenever autofocus is initiated?
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 22:30
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#57
|
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 22:52
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#58
|
Interesting. I'd be tempted to set a timer so that the autofocus is only started again once the previous one has returned something (though I'll have to check the api to see if it returns an "I've timed out" message).
The Following User Says Thank You to dragly For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-02
, 23:05
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#59
|
Actually I don't see any issues with pushing to extras-testing so that users can give it a go now (though up to dragly to say whether he's happy with the current state).
One thing we need to work out is how to avoid it then being sucked into the rating process (mainly as it annoys me to receive loads of curt messages saying why have you not done this/that/the other and still expect to be promoted. Grrr!) as it's not finished, just being put in there for people to be able to access more easily.
![]() |
2010-06-03
, 00:15
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#60
|
- Look them up on the web to see if any other stores have them in stock for a lower price. Currently this is only possible through search engines, but we (or other developers) will try to scrape this information from shops like for instance Amazon automatically.
- Share your opinion using Informed Individual (alpha).
- Get others' opinions using Informed Individual (alpha).
With QR codes and datamatrix codes:
- See what the code contains.
- Open it up in the browser if it is an URL.
- Add a contact if it's a VCard (probably in the next version)
+ more to come
The reason one would often like to find out what the product really is (as in it's full name) could be to do more searches for info about the product without having to type it in manually. It's just a way of doing things a bit faster and making it more convenient