![]() |
2007-08-20
, 20:52
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#62
|
<snip>
... but n800 cheese manages to get 140,000, so what is being proved, exactly?
WARNING! YOUR BATTERY IS LOW. CONTINUING TO USE THIS DEVICE MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF CRITICAL DATA.
![]() |
2007-08-20
, 22:09
|
Posts: 503 |
Thanked: 267 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Helsinki
|
#63
|
What nokia should have done differently is to use the 400MHz samsung processor (equiv to 520MHz strongArm in real terms, while still offering decent battery life). Such a processor would have made it fly.
![]() |
2007-08-20
, 22:25
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Leeds
|
#64
|
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 03:36
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ California
|
#65
|
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 05:10
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#66
|
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 05:27
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Oregon
|
#67
|
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 13:22
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#68
|
Maybe my N800 is just super-powered or something but I have never had to wait over 2 seconds for a page to load (unless its a page with a video on it or lot and lots of moving graphics / .gif images) and most the time I am connected through a cellphone that is not capable of 3g.
Here's an interesting comparison of recent mobile devices (Pepper Pad 3, Archos 704 WiFi, Sony mylo, Apple iPhone, Nokia N800, and Archos 604 WiFi.) on their web browsing performances:
http://www.pocketables.net/2007/08/review-website-.html
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 13:32
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#69
|
I think your n800 is definitely superpowered as the link provided by Yss shows that while the n800 does better than some of the competition, the only time its actually loads a website below 10 seconds in for Google news, which barely has any thing on it (text with some very small pics). For most websites as per the tester, >15 secs is the norm for the n800. Please refer to the quotation below per Yss's post
![]() |
2007-08-21
, 13:41
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#70
|
Is this how everyone will use theirs? Nope. But the possibility is there for that and more thanks to the openness of the device. Could the N800 use some improving? Oh hell yeah. I still don't get what's going on (or not going on) with the webcam, which is as close as you can get to a useless appendage without actually being one. Do I think that improvement is in the works? Of course. And that's arrived at without the benefit of inside info.