![]() |
2010-06-24
, 23:23
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Newport, Wales
|
#51
|
The Following User Says Thank You to INGINE For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 01:17
|
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Philippines
|
#52
|
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 01:49
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ galveston, tx
|
#53
|
It's not funny at all; it is expected. Have you read Jakiman's overclocking guide? He actually lists the expected failure rates for each max overclocking level. CPUs are NOT identical, this is known. It's interesting -- you should read up on it.
The Following User Says Thank You to noipv4 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 03:15
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#54
|
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 03:39
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Newport, Wales
|
#55
|
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 03:57
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#56
|
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 06:46
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ galveston, tx
|
#57
|
I don't use my N900 for phone calls. I never have so I have been using an early version of 125 - 800 since it first was available as a fiasco that I could load from the phone... Never had a problem and with no phone it never screwed back down to 600.
I have tried the Kernel Power app but the "Ideal" kernel that it recommends has always caused a crash at boot up. If that was the easiest and/or safest and it crashed I figured I didn't need the app and went back to my old 800 MHz fiasco.
The WiKi is long on technical specs but short on reasoning and I really don't have the inclination and time to find out "what's best for me" since it would all be subjective.
I was hoping that someone by now would say this is what is best for the average user and these are the reasons why.
That way if I get spontaneous reboots I have something to work against and when I did find out what worked best I might have a better understanding of why.
Right now I would be using Titan's "Ideal" If it didn't cause my N900 to spontaneously reboot. I would tweak it if I knew which
way to go and why.
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 07:38
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#58
|
I don't use my N900 for phone calls. I never have so I have been using an early version of 125 - 800 since it first was available as a fiasco that I could load from the phone... Never had a problem and with no phone it never screwed back down to 600.
I have tried the Kernel Power app but the "Ideal" kernel that it recommends has always caused a crash at boot up. If that was the easiest and/or safest and it crashed I figured I didn't need the app and went back to my old 800 MHz fiasco.
The WiKi is long on technical specs but short on reasoning and I really don't have the inclination and time to find out "what's best for me" since it would all be subjective.
I was hoping that someone by now would say this is what is best for the average user and these are the reasons why.
That way if I get spontaneous reboots I have something to work against and when I did find out what worked best I might have a better understanding of why.
Right now I would be using Titan's "Ideal" If it didn't cause my N900 to spontaneously reboot. I would tweak it if I knew which way to go and why.
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 07:49
|
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Philippines
|
#59
|
![]() |
2010-06-25
, 10:05
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Leicester,UK
|
#60
|
yeap it is, install the rootsh and the enhanced kernel (with the settings), type the command and that's it, for me i noticed that my battery lived longer, plus my device is way faster, give it a shot and try