![]() |
2010-05-17
, 00:48
|
Posts: 557 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#201
|
![]() |
2010-05-17
, 00:53
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#202
|
![]() |
2010-05-17
, 19:51
|
|
Posts: 609 |
Thanked: 243 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Eastern USA
|
#203
|
I remember from somewhere in benchmarks that Chrome was the fastest and Firefox was the second slowest (faster than IE). But Firefox used less memory or something like that. It concluded that Chrome for laptops was faster (even through user experience) but Firefox is simply the fastest in "lower powered" devices. I think web experience would be much faster with Firefox than Chrome for smartphones. (read we need a benchmark and comparison).
The Following User Says Thank You to xomm For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-23
, 13:22
|
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 48 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Manchester, England
|
#204
|
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 10:23
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#205
|
![]() |
2010-06-29
, 14:04
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#206
|
![]() |
2010-07-02
, 23:05
|
|
Posts: 609 |
Thanked: 243 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Eastern USA
|
#207
|
@xomm
So have you started the review?
I expect Firefox to be the fastest (efficient memory packaging) and Chrome to be the slowest (quickest but inefficient).
At least when it comes to opening a several tabs (>10).
Maybe the difference is less for single tabs.
Opera Mini etc will be faster than Firefox but they are Lite Browsers, not like a full desktop functioning like the Firefox, where it stays niche.
![]() |
2010-07-22
, 20:09
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kuwait
|
#210
|
![]() |
|