![]() |
2010-07-13
, 01:34
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 149 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#82
|
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 02:08
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oklahoma
|
#83
|
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 02:35
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#84
|
If Nokia would refrain from putting out such crap prototypes and phones he wouldn't be giving them bad reviews and this wouldn't be an issue.
My opinion
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 02:58
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#85
|
Forgive me for not believing Nokia. It's not like Nokia has ever lied or contradicted themselves right?
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 03:11
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 149 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#86
|
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 06:48
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 134 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Europe
|
#88
|
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 07:18
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#89
|
Again, he had access to it, he didn't have possession of it. Someone else broke the NDA not him. He is only being targetted because Nokia don't know who else to target. Lets not put unique identifiers on the device body and interface. Lets have the cops search someones house and drag him through the courts to "send a message".
This is nothing more than bullying through financial clout. If I told the cops that Nokia breached my privacy by sending a message to HQ from my phone without my permission, they would NOT go the Nokia HQ and search all their computers. They would tell me to stop wasting police time.
The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-13
, 13:51
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#90
|
You must be joking. He has clearly stated himself he has the device, and now contradicts himself. He even brags he has the qwerty version with him on vacation. He says he has managed to get 46 hours of music playback from the device, a remarkable feat considering he "only had it for a few hours".
Nokia is doing what it should do.
Y'know, it's not like an ordinary guy just going about his business is suddenly entangled in Nokia's leaks for no reason. He sought out information and prototypes/access to prototypes, knowing that he was likely violating trade secret laws, and encouraging others (i.e. his Nokia contact(s)) to violate trade secret laws; one can only assume he knew the risks.
It's not (AFAIK) like Nokia is changing the laws, or that he was in any way prevented from knowing them when he started out, so it seems like he knew the rules, and decided to play anyway. In that context, I just can't see how Nokia "doing it lawfully" can be anything but fair; he gambled, knowing the odds, and lost.
And I love how you take Nokia's assertions as nothing, and his "official statement" as absolute truth.
World's first inductively-charged N900!