Reply
Thread Tools
imperiallight's Avatar
Posts: 857 | Thanked: 362 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ London
#51
I thin you should re-read Nokia's statement again. There is a part that Nokia said MeeGo will be available for N900 but only be the source code and the rest will be the community contribution. There is no official support from Nokia. N900 may be the developer choice of device for meeGo but not the official device to support it.
Basically Nokia will frustrate you so much with slowness and lack of functionality on the n900 that you end up buying the newer device.

Standard

Last edited by imperiallight; 2010-07-17 at 23:14.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imperiallight For This Useful Post:
windows7's Avatar
Posts: 435 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#52
papa Jobs knows that the end users are not techy,
so he just tries to water the problem and shift the blame somewhere else, just like he did not so long ago when adobe (flash) refused to go along with papa Jobs rules and a few days later papa Jobs used the publicity in his favour, shifting the blame and the media put out his twisted version of the story.

You just watch how to media will write a few articles on this situation and soon everything will be water under the bridge.


Enough from me about papa Jobs monopoly.

Nokia owning symbian, due to the lack of apps on the n900, nokia should release a Symbian emulator for us to run some of the great symbian apps available. If they cannot create an emulator then maybe they should release the symbian source code for the community to come up with something, then we could share the symbian success on the n900, as well as everything else.

It certainly would offer some competition to apple.

Last edited by windows7; 2010-07-17 at 23:52.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to windows7 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 24 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#53
How did Nokia manage to get this statement out so quick? I certainly didn't expect a response until at least 6 months of developing the statement had past and 3 release dates missed.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to samuch For This Useful Post:
devu's Avatar
Posts: 431 | Thanked: 239 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#54
Symbian on N900? hmm...
__________________
My Toys: N900, Samsung Nexus S
Flaemo - Web based OS for Flash-enabled devices, more info here
 
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#55
iPhone customer got a defect on device. reports to apple. apple appologize and handed a new phone and says "we need to release an OS updatte"

customer bought a nokia phone......and then defect! reports to nokia, nokia says "sorry for the inconvenience" after that "we need to make a new device!"
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!

"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"

N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gabby131 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 490 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on May 2010
#56
Originally Posted by gabby131 View Post
iPhone customer got a defect on device. reports to apple. apple appologize and handed a new phone and says "we need to release an OS updatte"

customer bought a nokia phone......and then defect! reports to nokia, nokia says "sorry for the inconvenience" after that "we need to make a new device!"
More like. People found a defect. Reported to apple. Apple said "you are holding it wrong" and "Relax it's just a phone." People scratched their heads and continued using the devices. Group of experts decided to test the antenna. Apple got scared and blamed everything on the wrong algorithm for calculating and said that everything is gonna be fixed. Now they are finally admitting it (that it's a design flaw) and offering a non-restocking fee refund for the phone. Also, apple promised to fix this defect at undecided date. (probably when they are gonna make a next phone xD) However, the nokia part is correct. They just flood the market with phones in hopes that some of them will turnout to be successful.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to aligatro For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#57
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
We need to go back to the days of manually extending the external antenna. One of the many things lost in the cosmetic revolution..
Yanno... every phone I had before I got my Droid had an antennae that I could extend... and they were 100% clear and ALWAYS had excellent reception. I don't get it. I miss antennas too.
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#58
Originally Posted by techngro View Post
Steve Jobs by himself could BUY Nokia.
yes in some imaginary world. if you'd know how stock markets function, you would not claim such things.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#59
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
yes in some imaginary world. if you'd know how stock markets function, you would not claim such things.
Who the hell TRULY understands how the stock market works? Certainly not anybody on Wall Street.

"The way to make a small fortune in the stock market is to first begin with a large one."
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#60
Just because the nature of the market is unpredictable doesn't mean it's not understood. Just because we can't predict every wave in the ocean doesn't mean a tsunami is suddenly doing to make a 90 degree turn and flow upwards.

Ossipena is right. There is no way for Steve to "acquire" Nokia. Should someone want to ditch the brand because it's sinking, then yes, it's possible for old turtlehead -er- turtleneck to pick it up.

Note, however, that no sane person alive would sell Nokia not because of net asset worth (assets don't work like in games, just because you have 40Bn doesn't mean you buy stuff), but because the value of the brand and the patents it holds are way, way beyond the "toss around" suggested.

The Nokia brand, valued at $34.9 billion, is listed as the fifth most valuable global brand in the Interbrand/BusinessWeek Best Global Brands list of 2009 (first non-US company)
Also, Nokia also has stuff that isn't listed as asset but adds value to the enterprise. Here's one off the top of my head: Value of locations. Once encroached in the middle of the city, having that patch is more valuable than the bricks it's made of.

And remember, assets or no assets, when selling a business it's also about income. With over 1 Bn pouring in, there's another few you have to add to the sticker price.

Steve at his best estimate is at least a zero short of Nokia's worst estimate. Be reasonable.

Oh, and, Nokia is a public limited company and a strategic industry of Finland. There is no "for sale" sign at he entrance of Finland.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
nokia cares


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:48.