Active Topics

 


Page 45 of 51 « First 354344 45 4647 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
Rob1n is offline Rob1n
2010-07-23 , 13:54
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#441
Originally Posted by romanianusa View Post
Help me understand here. As an average user, why would this be big news?? I try out the fcam, nothing special to me?? It's all about taking pictures or making it clearer whatever i don't see much different from just taking it with the default. In fact, i find the program called "iFOCUS" more appealing because you can record a video while focus and adjust clearity.

if Fcam can let me do that, i'll be more interested.
The FCamera application is simply a demonstration of some of the functionality that the new (open source) camera API they've written offers. Currently, it has little use for average users, but it offers the potential for all sorts of sophisticated photo/video applications. The idea also seems to be to make this API a cross-platform standard, making it easier for developers to port applications.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post:
jacktanner is offline jacktanner
2010-07-23 , 14:26
Posts: 228 | Thanked: 145 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#442
Originally Posted by romanianusa View Post
Help me understand here. As an average user, why would this be big news?? I try out the fcam, nothing special to me?? It's all about taking pictures or making it clearer whatever i don't see much different from just taking it with the default.
The average user aspect is not a useful simplification. Here's a slightly more useful simplification - there are people who take snapshots just to document something (e.g., a birthday), and then there are people who really care about making great looking photographs, whether they are documentary or artistic or something else. If you're the latter kind of person, the FCamera apps and the FCam API just gave you a great new set of tools.

The new tools are much more powerful than what you get on phones. In some ways, they are even more powerful than what you get with high-end professional cameras, because the FCam API is available for anyone to program against (try programming the software in a top-of-the-line Nikon... you can't).

But it's even more than that, because the FCam API enables many new applications (or higher performance / better fidelity in existing applications) for the camera that don't produce "pictures" in the traditional sense. Think about all the various apps that use a camera - barcode scanners, document scanners, overlays on live video streams, etc.
 
attila77 is offline attila77
2010-07-23 , 14:33
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#443
Well, now that we know what the big Ovi news is, we can all ease up and enjoy fcamera as it's a million times more important/useful
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Laughing Man is offline Laughing Man
2010-07-23 , 14:35
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#444
Even if your an "Average user" you'd still find the development of the FCam API and its programs like FCamera useful. Things like image stabilization for example, so if you have a shaky hand the effect isn't as profound.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
titan is offline titan
2010-07-23 , 16:19
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#445
I have uploaded a fcam-drivers package for kernel-power
http://n900.tannerlab.com/kernel/fca....5-1_armel.deb

There is nothing special about those modules. They just need to be compiled
against the kernel-power headers.
In the future we probably need a separate fcam-drivers-package (but AFAIK HAM is not sophisticated enough to handle such dependencies and conflicts) or we would need to add modules for both kernel versions to the fcam-drivers package.
 

The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
abadams is offline abadams
2010-07-23 , 16:40
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 124 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#446
Originally Posted by titan View Post
I have uploaded a fcam-drivers package for kernel-power
http://n900.tannerlab.com/kernel/fca....5-1_armel.deb

There is nothing special about those modules. They just need to be compiled
against the kernel-power headers.
In the future we probably need a separate fcam-drivers-package (but AFAIK HAM is not sophisticated enough to handle such dependencies and conflicts) or we would need to add modules for both kernel versions to the fcam-drivers package.
Thanks Titan!

We'd be happy to add modules compiled for the power-kernel to fcam-drivers. I had a little trouble compiling them though. Maybe I was doing something silly. Here's what I did:

In scratchbox:

- fakeroot apt-get install kernel-power-headers

- apt-get source fcam-drivers

- edit fcam-drivers Makefile to point to /usr/src/kernel-power-headers

- lots of include files are missing from /usr/src/kernel-power-headers/linux/include, so I figure perhaps kernel-power-headers is more like a patch over the base headers package

- cp -r /usr/src/kernel-headers kernel-headers-combined

- cp -r /usr/src/kernel-power-headers kernel-headers-combined

- change the fcam-drivers Makefile to point to kernel-headers-combined

- Now it compiles, but after installing kernel-power (and kernel-power-flasher, etc, etc) on the device, power-cycling it, forcibly installing the fcam-drivers package, power-cycling again, I get the usual nonsense about wrong versions in dmesg when I try to insmod the new modules. vermagic seems to match uname though according to modinfo (2.6.28.10power37), so I get confused and give up.

What am I doing wrong?

- Andrew (one of the fcam guys)
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to abadams For This Useful Post:
titan is offline titan
2010-07-23 , 16:59
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#447
Hi Andrew,

Originally Posted by abadams View Post
We'd be happy to add modules compiled for the power-kernel to fcam-drivers. I had a little trouble compiling them though. Maybe I was doing something silly. Here's what I did:
- lots of include files are missing from /usr/src/kernel-power-headers/linux/include, so I figure perhaps kernel-power-headers is more like a patch over the base headers package
What am I doing wrong?
you're absolutely right. it's a bug that some headers are missing in kernel-power-headers
and I'm going to fix it with the next version (v38) this weekend.
 

The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
sophocha is offline sophocha
2010-07-23 , 17:05
Posts: 559 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Cyprus
#448
Excellent app!! and by the way, using the lehto kernel you can have both working.....overclocking and Fcam at the same time.No problems here!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sophocha For This Useful Post:
abadams is offline abadams
2010-07-23 , 17:08
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 124 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#449
Originally Posted by titan View Post
Hi Andrew,



you're absolutely right. it's a bug that some headers are missing in kernel-power-headers
and I'm going to fix it with the next version (v38) this weekend.
Ah ok. We'll release updated fcam-drivers as soon as we can after that.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to abadams For This Useful Post:
Berserk's Avatar
Berserk is offline Berserk
2010-07-23 , 17:38
Posts: 199 | Thanked: 156 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Holland
#450
I think I found a minor bug in Fcamera.. but I don't quite understand BugZilla, so I'll post it here in the hopes that someone will pick it up


I just took a picture, and it's called "photo2010.06.23_19.30.34.63"
So apparently it saves it as if it was taken on 23 June 2010, but it's July.

Could be a case of just adding "++" to the month variable, since January is always 0 in programming.

Edit: I'll look around for posting it somewhere..
Last edited by Berserk; 2010-07-23 at 17:43.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Berserk For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 45 of 51 « First 354344 45 4647 Last »

Tags
announced, color you loser, fail!, guessed wrong, misstep, riddle me this, you dun goofed

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:10.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top