Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
RolePlayGame's Avatar
Posts: 106 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Amazonia (Spain)
#11
A little bit off-topic (after watching W7 pics) but:
Except Nokia Geeks (thanxs danramos, very good definition) a bunch of we want a phone based on Android, rooted and with keyboard (perhaps resistive or high-def capacitative screen), I'm right or wrong?
ALL the N900 wonders are not based on maemo itself, are based on a rooted phone with Linux kernel. But Maemo, really? Yeah... it comes with Xterm... nice.
__________________

...
Coming soon
...
 
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#12
Why no kickstand?

And this megapixel fetish on the camera -- 12MP on a camera phone -- is just counterproductive.

Especially if it's going to be a phone, it would be preferable to have more hardware buttons, even if that's not the trend.

They "look nice," but I'm a function-over-form guy (if you gotta have a trade-off); and more hardware buttons and A KICKSTAND would be functional.

I like the screen-size/form-factor combination.
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#13
Yeah, IMO 12MP on a mobile phone with all its limitations is absurd.

Slower to save, slower to process, slower to share, takes more space, and not even with necessarily better image quality.

Here's hoping to more hardware keyboards...
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 
giecsar's Avatar
Posts: 91 | Thanked: 34 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Italy
#14
Ok looks like most of you decided to criticize Nokia for the lack of originality when it comes to design, but let's face it: when you design a touch phone there's not much room for creativity. I mean look at the phones that are already on the market, aren't they all pretty much the same?? HTC, iPhone, Samsung, SE - all monoblock handsets with a slim waist, a big screen covering most of the front side and one or more hardware keys on the bottom. The tendency is to create a touch screen as big as possible (because bigger is better) while making the body as thin as possible. Now how can you follow that recipe and still come up with a radically different design?
Now I'm not defending Nokia, but that's how things are right now.

I have to agree with the guy who complained about the limited choices when we were asked to vote. I'm now baffled to see a concept that envisions a ridiculously powerful handset with a width of only 8mm. Even today, there's no way you can cram all that in such a small space!

Now let me just say this... the BEST phone would simply be our beloved N900 with a nice slim waist and upgraded hardware - am I right?

Last edited by giecsar; 2010-07-27 at 21:51.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to giecsar For This Useful Post:
Posts: 158 | Thanked: 61 times | Joined on May 2010
#15
Unoriginal designs very evolutionary

1- N8 evolution
2- X6 evolution
3- iphone at the front with a lens slide E71 as the back

Then again, the actual phone shape design really doesnt matter that much to most people. Look at the iphone - thats not exactly original. Samsung Galaxy S etc.. Theres only a limited things you can do for a non keyboard candy bar format I guess..
 
msa's Avatar
Posts: 909 | Thanked: 216 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Bremen, Germany
#16
12 megapixel? 5 megapixels are more than enough. they propably should think about making the sensors better?!

anyway: no hardware-keyboard? good i guess, a reason not to buy any of these devices. i plan on keeping my n900 as long as possible.

/edit: btw, what does "auto-on lens cover" mean? are they opening and closing automatically? its obvious for the first device (the n8-looking one), but what about the others?

Last edited by msa; 2010-07-27 at 21:55.
 
Posts: 82 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#17
Originally Posted by giecsar View Post
Now let me just say this... the BEST phone would simply be our beloved N900 with a nice slim waist and upgraded hardware - am I right?
Right! and a better kickstand
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ChadiM For This Useful Post:
tissot's Avatar
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#18
Nokia at least is still building all metallic (aluminium) phones while Samsung flagship that costed me 630 euros is as plastic as you can get and iphones whole back is plastic aswell.

As far as i'm concerned i want N9 to be copy E7/N8-01 design and just put more powerful processor, higher reso screen and Meego inside and i'm done.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post:
Posts: 66 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#19
can't please eveyone .
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Edsal For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#20
Originally Posted by tissot View Post
Nokia at least is still building all metallic (aluminium) phones while Samsung flagship that costed me 630 euros is as plastic as you can get and iphones whole back is plastic aswell.

As far as i'm concerned i want N9 to be copy E7/N8-01 design and just put more powerful processor, higher reso screen and Meego inside and i'm done.
Just don't touch the aluminum around the case!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:01.