![]() |
2010-07-29
, 22:01
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#171
|
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 00:59
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#172
|
Forking everything to lock APIs at a given level discards the advantages of rapid, open development happening upstream. Maemo has wandered partially down that path several times already--with GTK, with being "Debian-based", etc.--and the going has always grown rapidly tougher as distance from the beaten path increased. As nice as it is to let users keep old applications from vendors long gone, binary compatibility leads to nightmares like Haiku's hybrid gcc2/gcc4 system.
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 01:12
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#173
|
|
2010-07-30
, 01:24
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#174
|
I'm not sure what you're talking about, or maybe you just don't get it. I'm a Nokia customer and things are evolving just fine for me. Is Nokia perfect? Not even close, but they've got the best road map for me. You, on the other hand, might have taken a wrong turn somewhere.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 01:58
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#175
|
If a platform is to be successful it need stability and some form of backward compatibility.
Apple understand this, microsoft understand this and as a result enjoy a healthy collection of applications.
If this was evolution then maemo would have remained and Nokia would have kept improving it. But Nokia haven't done this and have now reset their progress to the beginning.
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 02:00
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#176
|
The Nokia N900 Mobile Phone
The Following User Says Thank You to imperiallight For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 03:07
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#177
|
I'm playing devil's advocate here... do you think all is well in regards to Nokia's relationship with their customers?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 05:26
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#178
|
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 07:50
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#179
|
Sorry, but the continued improvement of iOS isn't comparable to the transition of Maemo to an every-person's phone OS. But please don't get me wrong, I can list more Nokia mistakes than you can. That's not the point though. Only one thing matters to me: What direction they're going. For handheld hardware coupled with an OS, Nokia's the only one I see going my way. But I can also see myself buying products from other companys that align themselves with the likes of a MeeGo or a Ubuntu.
When things evolve they generally become incompatible with the previous species.I like the idea of MeeGo; it's closer to what Maemo should have been in the first place. Rome wasn't built in a day, in was built in step 5 and there were many casualties.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bsving For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 08:21
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#180
|
![]() |
Tags |
nokiaisrelevant, noreally! |
|