![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:00
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#62
|
sorry 5 minutes ago you were a linux hacker........................................
and you don't know what tar and rsycnc are (two of the most basic linux commands.........................)
just STOP slagging others if you dont know what you are acttually talking about.........................................
PS im glad there are no problems on your system, as I would doubt you would have a clue how to diagnose and fix any problems you did have
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:00
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Worcester
|
#63
|
You forget relativity. Time for the observer travelling at the speed of light appears slower when observing the objects that are NOT travelling at the speed of light, but time for that same observer would appear to be normal relative to the observer himself. Objects observing the traveller moving at the speed of light remains normal relative to themselves but time for the objects travelling at the speed of light would appear to run faster.
Consider GPS satellites and the highly accurate clocks that ran normally here in atmosphere relative to everyone and everything travelling at the same speed. Once they went into orbit, these highly accurate clocks drifted ahead in time at a syncronized rate because they were travelling at high speeds above the Earth.
Time is not a spacial dimension, per se. It is a dimension, it can be travelled faster and slower (as yet, you can only travel FORWARD) and it is effected by gravity, but you cannot describe it as spacial.
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:02
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#64
|
The Following User Says Thank You to imperiallight For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-30
, 22:03
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#65
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:05
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#66
|
what are the chances that that EA of porting need for speed to the N900 ????
The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:05
|
|
Posts: 577 |
Thanked: 699 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Malta
|
#67
|
I'm also not sure why you think that the grumblers, like myself, don't own a Maemo device. Some of us have been here for years and complain BECAUSE we've had the experience of sticking with Maemo for so long.
If it suits you, that's fine. But a lot of the grumbling, I feel, seems to be infighting between the optimists and the disappointed. In the end, I think we all want the same things, though. Throwing around labels (like "fanboys") isn't going to help either way. Let the discussions happen either way. I want to hear from the guys that are happy with the stuff as much as I want to hear from the disgruntled. They're a barometer either way and sometimes I learn something new.
The Following User Says Thank You to pantera1989 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:06
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 95 times |
Joined on May 2008
|
#68
|
sorry 5 minutes ago you were a linux hacker........................................
and you don't know what tar and rsycnc are (two of the most basic linux commands.........................)
just STOP slagging others if you dont know what you are acttually talking about.........................................
PS im glad there are no problems on your system, as I would doubt you would have a clue how to diagnose and fix any problems you did have
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:06
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#69
|
I think you may have misunderstood the GPS satellite system. The reason the USAF have to reset the GPS clock every day is because they are slightly further away from the gravity-well that is the earth so are fractionally less affected than we are.
As they are in a geostationary orbit they would be travelling through space at the same speed as ourselves so I don't see their relative speed as a factor here.
At least that's what Brian Cox said on the BBC recently and he's a nuclear physics professor at CERN so I'm going with him
![]() |
2010-07-30
, 22:06
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#70
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
entertainment, new isheep, nokia otaku, oh no dont go, outrage, popcorn time, see ya dork, shark week, trololol, what a dick |
|
In honesty, though, you're right--if it suits YOU, it's nobody else's place to tell you that the other thing is better for YOU. That said, though, it's also stands to reason that you can't criticize someone else's opinion if that device doesn't suit THEM. I think a LOT of the angst is because the N900 had the potential to hit the mark for so many of the people that were dragged in by the "open source" and "Linux" marketing for these Maemo devices from Nokia but failed to see the same kind of transparency and comfort we're used to seeing from desktop distributions that are far more open-source and Linux based. In the end, what Nokia delivered was actually no better than their competition and that has much of the community that, up until the N900, had been optimistic about that openness. Ultimately, the offering continues to be a dangling carrot that keeps moving farther away instead of moving closer.
If it suits you, that's fine. But a lot of the grumbling, I feel, seems to be infighting between the optimists and the disappointed. In the end, I think we all want the same things, though. Throwing around labels (like "fanboys") isn't going to help either way. Let the discussions happen either way. I want to hear from the guys that are happy with the stuff as much as I want to hear from the disgruntled. They're a barometer either way and sometimes I learn something new.