![]() |
2010-09-18
, 03:48
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#62
|
That's just the very thing about the article--whether you agree or not, the main point is still that Nokia has a perception problem. I've never used Symbian, myself, but the impression I get from various exposure to people who have is a generally negative one that makes it sound/feel retro and outdated. I can't say that I think that--it's just the impression I'm getting from the general consensus, right or wrong. Nokia would do well to fix that perception.
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 03:58
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#63
|
[...]
Anything that is based on Symbian can only be evolutionary not revolutionary so it will always be behind.
I don't really get the symbian bashing either
OK, symbian1 did have a bad touch interface and somewhat dated graphics, but it looks like that will be better with the new symbian3 UI + capacitive touch amoled screens. Sure, Symbian is not really gonna satisfy your bling lust, but it is a workhorse. I am happier for it to be around than for it to die.
here are some things I like about symbian(as supplied by nokia at least) that you don't really get with the other OSs on market:
deeply integrated voip stack included for free, even with g729 codec
included office viewing and editing
included webdav client
included caldav(symbian3)
included pdf viewer
included voice nav
battery sipping
browser has flash(yes, it is lite, but it works most places where you would need it)
lower cpu/mem necessary(don't we celebrate that in the linux world?)
included syncml for not just pim, but also other stuff
very good addressbook, especially being able to having the note attached to a contact appear when they call.
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 06:44
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#64
|
If you guys are interested, here's my current opinion of Nokia's state of affairs.
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...ive-house.aspx
The Following User Says Thank You to etuoyo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 18:00
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Texas
|
#65
|
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 18:08
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#66
|
It's not just Bloggers that don't understand Nokia or where its coming from.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/09/...ack/index.html
I see most of this as lazy journalism with a lack of research in the subject, which appears to be rife, I guess at least a blogger piece is clearly an opinion piece.
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 04:11
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ San Diego
|
#67
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Russianhaxor For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 04:26
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#68
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 04:42
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#69
|
C'mon, man! The caption for picture 8 claims that the 5800, released in 2008, was Nokia's first touchscreen phone. The 7710 was a touchscreen phone and was released in what, 2005?
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 04:45
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ San Diego
|
#70
|
Proof...