![]() |
2010-09-19
, 11:31
|
Posts: 838 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#82
|
Um, no its not cool but that doesn't give you a license to steal. How about this, send us your address and we'll send all of the homeless people in your city and take all the stuff they need. Yeah, what's wrong with that? They're starving and hungry. You'd be glad to right that wrong, right?
The bottom line to your thinking is that its a good thing as long as its someone else's dime. Once it's yours, then wait, hold up. That's not right.
Hypocrite much?
We're talking about right and wrong. Let's talk specifics. What software? Photoshop? you can it for like $199 (someone else said) or maybe it's Office fo rlike $70. Can not this starving child save $70? Unless that child is literally naked and starving I'd say he can probably scrimp and save.
That college boy will spend more on the cool laptop he wants or MCB or iPod. But somehow they find money for that. Let's be real. Kids that need software in college have student labs they can go to to get access to everything they need. Don't pretend that the student will die or all of a sudden lose his brain and fail because he won't. He just has to work a little harder.
Wait, your saying if you're black you can get higher scores on tests because of the color of your skin? Seriously. No.... that's wrong... I know we disagree, but trust me, Affirmative Action doesn't give you different test scores. I'm pretty sure about that.
The fact that you would belittle the plight of blacks from the past by comparing them to students? You have got to be kidding.
Slaves were kidnapped, beaten, sold, raped and forced to work in inhuman conditions against their will and you compare it to students that a) want to go to college b) know that in order to go to college they need school supplies?
So no, they're not the same and you're still wrong. I mean if you follow your thinking that poor students have a moral right to steal, then what prevents them from taking other "rich" student's laptops?
And what constitutes poor? Naked and starving or the student too lazy to get off their *** and get a job and only live off the allowance their mom gives them? Please.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 11:34
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#83
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 11:53
|
Posts: 134 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#84
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 13:03
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 34 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Belgrade, Serbia
|
#85
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 13:04
|
Posts: 134 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Russia,Moscow
|
#86
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 13:25
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#87
|
I fail to see how the argument is broken, Benson.
Using that logic, someone who would never buy a Mercedes but steals one is not committing theft.
Initially, they have a certain amount of physical assets (e.g. boxed software). If I don't download it, they keep all their physical assets and I don't pay them any money. If I do download it, they still keep all their physical assets, and I don't pay them any money. They didn't lose anything by my downloading it, either vs. the initial state, or vs. the hypothetical state where I didn't copy that floppy, and where there is no loss there is no theft
Initially, they have a certain amount of physical assets (e.g.boxed softwarecars). If I don'tdownloadsteal it, they keep all their physical assets and I don't pay them any money. If I dodownloadsteal it, theystill keep all their physical assetslose a car, and I don't pay them any money. Theydidn't lose anythinglost an actual vehicle by mydownloadingstealing it, either vs. the initial state, or vs. the hypothetical state where Ididn't copy that floppywouldn't steal a car.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 13:31
|
|
Posts: 57 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Melbourne, Australia
|
#88
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 13:42
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#89
|
@ysss apply that rule for MS and Adobe products too and everyone will be happy.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 14:05
|
Posts: 838 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#90
|
As cold as it sounds, you always have a choice.
I've chosen to pay for my goods and services. If I can't afford them, I don't obtain them. If they're unavailable via anything but illicit means, I don't obtain them.
Start down the path of rationalization, and you find you risk undermining any ethical positions you would take on other subjects.
But some are okay with that.
![]() |
Tags |
bollocks!, here be pirates, pirateparty ftw |
|
I've chosen to pay for my goods and services. If I can't afford them, I don't obtain them. If they're unavailable via anything but illicit means, I don't obtain them.
Start down the path of rationalization, and you find you risk undermining any ethical positions you would take on other subjects.
But some are okay with that.
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net