Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,224 | Thanked: 1,763 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#11
Originally Posted by ctbeiser View Post
I think it's worth noting that Maemo is pretty much entirely open source, with the exception of the aforementioned blobs
It would have been worth noting, if it was true. Since this openness claim has nothing to do with reality, it is not worth noting at all.

Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
some firmwares, like for the GSM modem, are also closed ('cause of some lame law that punishes toolmakers for what use random people give to the tools)
No. The firmware is close because Nokia chose that it be close. There is no law requiring it to be close.
__________________
My repository

"N900 community support for the MeeGo-Harmattan" Is the new "Mer is Fremantle for N810".

No more Nokia devices for me.

Last edited by Matan; 2010-10-03 at 15:37.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 395 | Thanked: 165 times | Joined on May 2010 @ TMO
#12
You realise that GSM contains many patented technologies?
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#13
there is one major reason for gsm part being closed: operators

just think about a device which has its gsm modem functionality compiled a tad wrong causing a havoc at least to the cell tower it is connected to. fixing such things costs pretty much. One estimate was when someone tampered with finnish towers and did something small. cost for operator per tower: 200 000+ eur. and if I remember right, there were 2 operators involved so you can double the figure....
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#14
Originally Posted by Matan View Post
It would have been worth noting, if it was true. Since this openness claim has nothing to do with reality, it is not worth noting at all.



No. The firmware is close because Nokia chose that it be close. There is no law requiring it to be close.
As far as I ḱnow Adobe Flash and SGX driver from Texas Instrument is not open sourced.

I dont know about the wifi/bt driver but maybe those driver is not open sourced.

So stop blame Nokia for everything! This is how bussiness work we will NEVER see fully open sourced drivers and so on. Not even Meego Hardware will have fully open sourced drivers etc...

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2010-10-03 at 16:17.
 
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 154 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#15
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
just think about a device which has its gsm modem functionality compiled a tad wrong causing a havoc at least to the cell tower it is connected to.
Right. Its one thing to give people free hands to mess with their devices, and another to give them free hands to mess it for everybody else.
 
Posts: 1,224 | Thanked: 1,763 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#16
Originally Posted by rickysio View Post
You realise that GSM contains many patented technologies?
Do you realise that using patents as a reason for closeness is the dumbest argument that can be made?

Unless, of course, the claim is that Nokia try to hide which patents they use from the patent owners.

Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
As far as I ḱnow Adobe Flash and SGX driver from Texas Instrument is not open sourced.

I dont know about the wifi/bt driver but maybe those driver is not open sourced.

So stop blame Nokia for everything! This is how bussiness work we will NEVER see fully open sourced drivers and so on. Not even Meego Hardware will have fully open sourced drivers etc...
If you don't know, why do you feel such a strong urge to participate in this thread? What is the relevance of drivers to this thread?

Phone application is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

Contacts application is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

SMS application is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

Network management system is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

cherry trojan is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

Map application is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.

Etc. etc. etc.

I hope you know more now.
__________________
My repository

"N900 community support for the MeeGo-Harmattan" Is the new "Mer is Fremantle for N810".

No more Nokia devices for me.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#17
Originally Posted by rickysio View Post
You realise that GSM contains many patented technologies?
Patents don't prevent open source. They can be licensed on open source principles or for profit. It is more a matter of what the owner wants to do.
__________________
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation
 
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#18
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
Not even Meego Hardware will have fully open sourced drivers etc...
Actually MeeGo for netbooks is fully open source. And this is a PITA. There are only some netbooks that uses HW where all drivers are available in open source form. Most drivers are available and is freely redistributable, but contain blobs. MeeGos policy is to only redistribute drivers that are fully source code open source. This doesn't even make sense, because the blobs are often low level firmware that need to be in binary form no matter what. The only alternative is to redesign the HW to contain the blobs in ROM.

How will this be with MeeGo for the N900 ? I wonder, surely there has to be lots of blobs in there. I guess Nokia can redistribute it, but not MeeGo?
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#19
Originally Posted by Matan View Post
cherry trojan is owned by Nokia - no third party to blame - close.
Assuming we're not suddenly discussing flavored condoms, I have no clue what "cherry trojan" meant, and Google returns little of relevance.

Enlightenment, please?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post:
JohnLF's Avatar
Posts: 551 | Thanked: 507 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ North West England
#20
I was wondering that too. Thanks for saving me a google search or two ;-)
__________________
My websites: -
http://www.lefebvre.org.uk
http://www.lefebvre.ltd.uk
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:08.