![]() |
2010-10-28
, 04:48
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-10-28
, 13:27
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#3
|
http://arewefastyet.com/
![]() |
2010-10-28
, 15:29
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#4
|
Running the Sunspider[1] benchmark on the latest Fennec nightly[2], I was pleasantly surprised to find a nice, low result.
Compared to the iPhone 4 at 10902ms from a major news site[3], I would say our phone still has lots of life left.
[1] http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspide...sunspider.html
[2] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...mo5-gtk/en-US/
[3] http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...benchmarks.ars
![]() |
2010-10-28
, 17:22
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#5
|
That's not browser performance and that's not when run on an ARM CPU like in the N900. That test is run via a special command line interface to the Firefox JavaScript engine.
It's still a nice link though.
![]() |
2010-10-28
, 21:53
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#6
|
![]() |
2010-11-19
, 21:45
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#8
|
![]() |
2010-11-19
, 22:09
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Dunfermline, Scotland
|
#9
|
![]() |
2010-11-19
, 22:31
|
Posts: 156 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Los Angeles, CA
|
#10
|
Compared to the iPhone 4 at 10902ms from a major news site[3], I would say our phone still has lots of life left.
[1] http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspide...sunspider.html
[2] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...mo5-gtk/en-US/
[3] http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...benchmarks.ars