|
2010-10-27
, 11:38
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#112
|
|
2010-10-28
, 02:07
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Australia
|
#113
|
Could you consider making a new binary package for us PR 1.3 users? The version is now 2.2.140-1+0m5, so I assume the (fake) version for your package will again cause dependency issues. Might also be worth testing if the real version identity (.141) is ok for PR 1.3 dependencies.
Probably would be best to keep the "2.2.138-1+0m5" version available too as I assume many people still use PR 1.2.
|
2010-10-31
, 13:47
|
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 123 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#114
|
|
2010-11-01
, 12:11
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#115
|
Could you consider making a new binary package for us PR 1.3 users? The version is now 2.2.140-1+0m5, so I assume the (fake) version for your package will again cause dependency issues. Might also be worth testing if the real version identity (.141) is ok for PR 1.3 dependencies.
Probably would be best to keep the "2.2.138-1+0m5" version available too as I assume many people still use PR 1.2.
|
2010-11-01
, 13:38
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#116
|
|
2010-11-01
, 14:20
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#117
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tomast For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-02
, 08:29
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#118
|
reading the posts got me to thinking,
now with the updates and all the current updates,
do i still need to uninstall catorize to save battery life?
|
2010-11-02
, 08:39
|
Posts: 189 |
Thanked: 53 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#119
|
|
2010-11-02
, 08:52
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#120
|
Probably would be best to keep the "2.2.138-1+0m5" version available too as I assume many people still use PR 1.2.