![]() |
2007-10-26
, 15:54
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Eastern Ontario, Canada
|
#22
|
But it was interesting because I realised the Eee is a Linux computer. It's Linux as we know it on the desktop, complete with imperfections and annoyances.
In contrast, Linux on the N tablets is a new operating system (just like OS X is effectively BSD, but is its own operating system). If I hadn't been told that the N tablets run Linux, I wouldn't be aware. OS2006/7/8 has been tailored for mobile Internet use and the general user, whereas this can't be said of the Eee.
So the N series wins on this score, if nothing else.
![]() |
2007-10-26
, 16:40
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ United Kingdom
|
#23
|
Hmmm... not sure I am with you on this one. Being a new OS means that existing apps have to be ported. And I could argue that Nokia have two incompatible family of OS's OS2005/6 and OS2007/8.
Anyway, I guess you won't want Ubuntu on an EEE either:
http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,...331777b,00.htm
![]() |
2007-10-26
, 17:01
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#24
|
My point is that some people are scared of Linux. Nokia managed to produce a non-Linux version of Linux. With OS2008, it sounds like they've moved even further away from traditional Linux desktops.
I still find it surprising and not entirely accurate when I read that the N tablets run a "distro of Linux". Technically this is true, but it's not practically true.
![]() |
2007-10-26
, 17:28
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Eastern Ontario, Canada
|
#25
|
My point is that some people are scared of Linux. Nokia managed to produce a non-Linux version of Linux. With OS2008, it sounds like they've moved even further away from traditional Linux desktops.
![]() |
2007-10-26
, 18:15
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Eastern Ontario, Canada
|
#26
|
Anyway, back to the EEE. All of the screen shots that I have seen show about 1" of black frame around the actual display. I wonder why?
I think that ASUS could fit a much larger display into the same form factor.
![]() |
2007-10-26
, 19:29
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#27
|
Anyway, back to the EEE. All of the screen shots that I have seen show about 1" of black frame around the actual display. I wonder why?
![]() |
2007-10-27
, 17:02
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ United Kingdom
|
#28
|
![]() |
2007-10-27
, 18:07
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#29
|
![]() |
2007-10-27
, 19:26
|
Posts: 200 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#30
|
Incidentally, look how small the Eee is in Rupert Goodwins' hands. He's a big fella (I used to work with him) but that's definitely a small computer.
But it was interesting because I realised the Eee is a Linux computer. It's Linux as we know it on the desktop, complete with imperfections and annoyances.
In contrast, Linux on the N tablets is a new operating system (just like OS X is effectively BSD, but is its own operating system). If I hadn't been told that the N tablets run Linux, I wouldn't be aware. OS2006/7/8 has been tailored for mobile Internet use and the general user, whereas this can't be said of the Eee.
So the N series wins on this score, if nothing else.