![]() |
2010-11-21
, 21:08
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1221
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-21
, 22:14
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#1222
|
What makes you say it's the same problem? There are plenty of people more knowledgable about this than me, but my understanding is that Android is more tightly tied to 800x480 resolution than Maemo.
Nokia should have put out a tablet during the last couple years.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lardman For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-21
, 22:24
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#1223
|
The maximum resolution of Android is a popular misunderstanding as far as I can tell. The Android SDK's emulator is limited in resolution, though the OS guidelines have three distinct 'sizes' and 'densities' that are allowed, one of which is 'large screen' that has been supported since v1.6 (IIRC). In any event, I'm quite certain that no special hackery has been required for the Galaxy Tab to display at 1024x600, or the Toshiba AC100 for that matter.
I would argue that Android's 'market fragmentation' is much lower than that of Apple's, in that up until this point Apple's support across devices is largely limited to the device itself. Android binaries on the other hand span multiple OS's, and multiple devices quite well. It's clear that the OS design bore this in mind from the outset. For example, properly developed apps display work flawlessly on the Tab, though often with phone-esque UIs.
I suspect that Gingerbread/Honeycomb will feature a more flexible UI for larger screens, but ideas like 'fragmentation' and android not being 'tablet ready' are ideas popularized by modern media, but are no moreso than any other OS out there. In fact, I'd argue that due to Android's design, it's far less subject to 'fragmentation' than other mobile OSs.
The Following User Says Thank You to lardman For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-21
, 22:37
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#1224
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imperiallight For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 03:21
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#1225
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nilchak For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 06:35
|
Posts: 1,082 |
Thanked: 1,235 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#1226
|
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 11:24
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1227
|
I'll have to find the article I was reading - it explicitly said that Samsung had had to do some hackery to support such a large screen res, and that Honeycomb would support larger res screens than the current max (which was something like 960x480? I can't really remember)
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 11:35
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1228
|
Forget about your expensive toy get your self the real deal. Dell Inspiron Duo http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...043#post880043
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 11:48
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1229
|
![]() |
2010-11-22
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1230
|
![]() |
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
|