|
2010-10-13
, 12:10
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#42
|
The Following User Says Thank You to abubakar For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-13
, 12:18
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#43
|
|
2010-10-13
, 12:20
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#44
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-25
, 16:55
|
Posts: 1,082 |
Thanked: 1,235 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#45
|
Tags |
exaggeration, intel |
|
Agreed entirely to a certain extent.
Yes stock Windows7 on a tablet is a really poor UX for a tablet device.
But I think people already knew (like I did) what the UI/UX for the iPad was going to be before launch/leaks... it was obvious actually, the iTouch blown out of proportion.
So no; developers definently knew about how to develop a good UX for a tablet and it didn't have to be an iClone.
But I do agree that a market for a tablet was actually non-existent before the iPad. I should've clarified this. So yes if MeeGo was in its final stages and a company (Acer?) rolled out with MeeGo and the Z600 about June, the market would've been available (and probably at its high point when people were curious to this new form of mobile computing).
And they would now had 4 months to fix the bugs and imperfections from rushing things, which is adequate me thinks. While the update will cost half of the development team, the other half could be busy for a future release.
Then from late September to late November the whole team could work on brining
the new build+update=final new build =>used by a well-known OEM for a mass-market of a much better quality tablet => a lot of Xmas sales worldwide! => developers flock => gradual increase in applications
... and Gingerbread has yet to be released.
Perhaps, MeeGo should employ me? XD
Last edited by Kangal; 2010-10-13 at 11:43.