|
2010-12-06
, 15:15
|
Posts: 692 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#2
|
|
2010-12-06
, 15:39
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#3
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-06
, 15:42
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#4
|
|
2010-12-06
, 15:48
|
Posts: 692 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#5
|
Did you check whether the space had actually freed up after you originally moved the directory? The filesystem can't properly delete a file if it's still open (it deletes the directory entry, but the file data must be kept), so I'd guess the free space never actually dropped, and when you moved them back it had to create a new copy. A reboot would close the files and allow the deletion to complete, freeing up the space again.
That can't be caused by the files being de-sparsed, that's almost the size of the files themselves! Why such a difference? When I look at the breakdown with Storage Usage I don't see anything different, but df-h confirms the loss of free space.
I'm going to restore my rootfs and /opt from a backup I made on Saturday, but still, WTF!?
"Impossible is not in the Maemo vocabulary" - Caballero