Active Topics
-
[ANNOUNCE] MeeShop - new app store (10)
to Applications by aspergerguy - 16 hrs, 9 mins ago -
HTTP-401 Sfos-Builder when using /etc/ssu credentials (0)
to SailfishOS by insanelysexy - 1 day, 22 hrs ago -
Longtime users: What device(s) are you using today? (54)
to General by ryu1 - 4 days, 3 hrs ago -
Registering (1)
to General by Halftux - 6 days, 19 hrs ago - more...
heartbreakdoctor |
2010-12-11
, 17:34
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Alexandria,Egypt
|
#91
|
so guys wat is best min and max frequency for gd battery life n best performance?,my min is 500 n max 850
 |
|
2010-12-12
, 11:19
|
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 153 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#92
|
Originally Posted by heartbreakdoctor
First of all I'd recomment the "ulv" preset that kernel-config offers. For me 850 seems way to high, I'd go with 700 MHz as maximum. This gives good performance and good battery life (with ulv preset).
my min is 500 n max 850
As a minimum frequency I'd choose 250MHz.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to direx For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-12
, 16:43
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Alexandria,Egypt
|
#93
|
k am doin min 250 max 700,i think emptyin swap memory will fasten so does anyone knw how to empty it??
|
|
2010-12-12
, 18:23
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#94
|
I'm quite new to "QCPUFreq" and I don't want to overclock or underclock. What I do want is to save more better life and keep all original factory settings. I hear interesting features with "SmartReflex" so..., is it possible to just use "QCPUFreq" for only "SmartReflex" because I hear it helps ( and will it work) saving battery life. Thank you!
|
|
2010-12-13
, 14:25
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Alexandria,Egypt
|
#95
|
guys i tired load ulv but couldnt play videos so any ideas how to solve that ??n i made it lv it works good.and any idea on how to empty swap memory ??
|
|
2010-12-17
, 20:01
|
|
Posts: 650 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#96
|
Hi direx, thanks for the very useful app. One suggestion I'd like to make is having a configurable upper limit in "Setting" to limit the range that the slider controls. For example, I could set max limiter to 850MHz and the max frequency the slider can go will be limited to 850.
I'd like to see this feature because I did accidentally drag the slider too far a couple of times while adjusting frequency. The limiter would serve as a safety feature in such case.
I'd like to see this feature because I did accidentally drag the slider too far a couple of times while adjusting frequency. The limiter would serve as a safety feature in such case.
| The Following User Says Thank You to sony123 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-17
, 20:38
|
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 153 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#97
|
Originally Posted by sony123
I like this idea - I'll implement it in the next release. Thanks for the feedback!
Hi direx, thanks for the very useful app. One suggestion I'd like to make is having a configurable upper limit in "Setting" to limit the range that the slider controls. For example, I could set max limiter to 850MHz and the max frequency the slider can go will be limited to 850.
Meanwhile I would like to ask you people to vote for QCPUFreq in extras-testing. So many people have downloaded this application and not even 10 people were able to give some feedback in the extras-testing page of QCPUFreq in the past 4 weeks - this makes me kinda sad.
|
|
2010-12-17
, 22:51
|
|
Posts: 650 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#98
|
Originally Posted by direx
Just voted.... QCPUFreq is reaching Extra!
Meanwhile I would like to ask you people to vote for QCPUFreq in extras-testing. So many people have downloaded this application and not even 10 people were able to give some feedback in the extras-testing page of QCPUFreq in the past 4 weeks - this makes me kinda sad.
|
|
2010-12-17
, 23:44
|
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#99
|
I do not know, if QCPUFreq had something to do with it, but I had this problem yesterday and fiddling with QCPUFreq and returning normal non-overclocked settings did not fix the issue.
I started by enabling lv-profile in x-terminal and then after raised the upper limit to 900 Mhz with QCPUFreq. Then noticed something was wrong, and reboots didn't fix the problem, nor reseting the settings to normal non-overclocked and non-undervoltaged levels.
Does QCPUFreq currently change the voltage levels or just change the upper limit of CPU frequency?
I started by enabling lv-profile in x-terminal and then after raised the upper limit to 900 Mhz with QCPUFreq. Then noticed something was wrong, and reboots didn't fix the problem, nor reseting the settings to normal non-overclocked and non-undervoltaged levels.
Does QCPUFreq currently change the voltage levels or just change the upper limit of CPU frequency?
|
|
2010-12-18
, 00:23
|
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Seatle, WA
|
#100
|
Originally Posted by ing005
By default it runs at 500Mhz, if you look at the graph given in titan kernel 500Mhz is default with vanilla kernel. As such I run with 500Mhz and 1000Mhz. BTW 500Mhz takes same current as 250Mhz as per titan, so why bother....
my n900 keep running at 500 mhz
i tried removing qcpufreq , deinstall kernel setting and flash kernel with flasher 3.5 but didn't help
Please help , thanks