Active Topics
-
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (18)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 10 hrs, 23 mins ago -
Maemo 20th Anniversary (4)
to Brainstorm by teroyk - 2 days, 5 hrs ago -
Nokia Booklet 3G (RX-75) Drivers (64)
to Alternatives by teroyk - 2 days, 5 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (46)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 9 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-12-16
, 08:47
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Slovakia
|
#22
|
hi..i was running with ideal constantly 900 Mhz.it was perfect, the reason is that Im in work all time on gprs connection (web,facebook,skype), calls, sms, emails...and for this usage it was really fine. but im worried if it did not short the lifetime of processor.what do you think abou it..the temperature was max 35°C..
 |
|
2010-12-16
, 09:05
|
|
Posts: 160 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#23
|
here is my profile
max heat is 43Celsius
in high and long usage
all works fine and smooth
including flash videos 
and i will never ever go to the normal state xD
my battery stands for 1 day @ high useage
i'm fine with my profile
my n900 likes it, too
Greetz
Erazor
Code:
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - CREATE A COPY OF IT FOR CUSTOMIZATION # minimum frequency to use MINFREQ=125 # maximum frequency to use MAXFREQ=750 # list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate" FREQS="0:30,90 125:30,90 250:30,360 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520" SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0 SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0 GOVERNOR=ondemand UP_THRESHOLD=75 SAMPLING_RATE=150000 IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1 POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
in high and long usage
all works fine and smooth
including flash videos and i will never ever go to the normal state xD
my battery stands for 1 day @ high useage
i'm fine with my profile
my n900 likes it, too
Greetz
Erazor
 |
|
2010-12-16
, 09:13
|
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Genova (Italy)
|
#24
|
/*OFF OPIC*/
Outrageous? Absurd?
First of all, I was only speculating, I was not "quite sure": I didn't say "I know that everyone overclock", and I didn't say "I am sure that the majority of us is overclocking", I only expressed my thought (I said "I think") and tried to explain it. Instead, you are sure that I was wrong, and that my error was otrageus: on which bases do you think I could have been outrageus? Maybe what I think is absurd as you said (I don't think so, maybe it's simply not true: this poll will show us), but not otrageus. Why are you so angry?
Btw, I didn't say 1.1GHz, but 1GHz: 100MHz of difference are important when talking about a 600MHz processor
/*OFF TOPIC END*/
Last edited by MaddogG; 2010-12-16 at 09:41.
Originally Posted by geneven
I think you are talking about me (http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1660), but tell me if I'm wrong, I will immediatly apologize and delete this post
The reason for this poll is that people have recently made outrageous misstatements about overclocking. Someone recently was quite sure that most people here overclock, and the speed they overclock at is 1.1 Ghz.
That is of course absurd, and the reasonable way to prove it's not true is to poll people.
BTW: I do regularly oc to 900 mHz max, but I have never even tried faster, not even once.
Outrageous? Absurd?
First of all, I was only speculating, I was not "quite sure": I didn't say "I know that everyone overclock", and I didn't say "I am sure that the majority of us is overclocking", I only expressed my thought (I said "I think") and tried to explain it. Instead, you are sure that I was wrong, and that my error was otrageus: on which bases do you think I could have been outrageus? Maybe what I think is absurd as you said (I don't think so, maybe it's simply not true: this poll will show us), but not otrageus. Why are you so angry?
Btw, I didn't say 1.1GHz, but 1GHz: 100MHz of difference are important when talking about a 600MHz processor
/*OFF TOPIC END*/
Last edited by MaddogG; 2010-12-16 at 09:41.
 |
|
2010-12-16
, 09:30
|
|
Posts: 134 |
Thanked: 247 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Spain, EU
|
#25
|
I have been running this profile for months now:
MINFREQ=125
MAXFREQ=900
FREQS="0:22,90 250:28,180 500:29,360 550:32,400 600:34,430 700:41,430 750:42,430 805:45,430 850:46,500 900:49,500 950:52,500 1000:55,500 1100:63,520 1150:69,520 "
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
MINFREQ=125
MAXFREQ=900
FREQS="0:22,90 250:28,180 500:29,360 550:32,400 600:34,430 700:41,430 750:42,430 805:45,430 850:46,500 900:49,500 950:52,500 1000:55,500 1100:63,520 1150:69,520 "
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
|
|
2010-12-16
, 10:27
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Slovakia
|
#26
|
current kernel configuration:
current frequency: 900
supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 700 750 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150
min. frequency: 900
max. frequency: 900
avoid frequencies: 125 250
active frequencies: 0:25,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520
SmartReflex VDD1=0, VDD2=0
governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 1, up threshold= 75, sampling rate= 150000, powersave bias= 0
thats it...what do you think?
current frequency: 900
supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 700 750 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150
min. frequency: 900
max. frequency: 900
avoid frequencies: 125 250
active frequencies: 0:25,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520
SmartReflex VDD1=0, VDD2=0
governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 1, up threshold= 75, sampling rate= 150000, powersave bias= 0
thats it...what do you think?
|
|
2010-12-16
, 10:32
|
|
Posts: 160 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#27
|
Originally Posted by sverik
everytime on 900MHz o.O
current kernel configuration:
current frequency: 900
supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 700 750 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150
min. frequency: 900
max. frequency: 900
avoid frequencies: 125 250
active frequencies: 0:25,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520
SmartReflex VDD1=0, VDD2=0
governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 1, up threshold= 75, sampling rate= 150000, powersave bias= 0
thats it...what do you think?
thats a way to heavy
|
|
2010-12-16
, 14:29
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#28
|
Originally Posted by sverik
turn the minimum down or u really will fry it!!
current kernel configuration:
current frequency: 900
supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 700 750 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150
min. frequency: 900
max. frequency: 900
avoid frequencies: 125 250
active frequencies: 0:25,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520
SmartReflex VDD1=0, VDD2=0
governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 1, up threshold= 75, sampling rate= 150000, powersave bias= 0
thats it...what do you think?
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
 |
|
2010-12-16
, 14:35
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#29
|
It only heats up under load. It can be running at 900Mhz comfortably without issue so long as there is zero load on it. Once load is applied and it starts to have worker threads that's when the heat starts to build up as the current starts to pass through it.
Although I do side with the idea of maybe turning min frequency down to about 500Mhz.
Although I do side with the idea of maybe turning min frequency down to about 500Mhz.
|
|
2010-12-16
, 14:38
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#30
|
Originally Posted by MaddogG
dont take it personally, for one it wasn't geneven who started this poll it was me, i believe i did see your comment but its hardly the only one on these lines. so yes that is ONE of the reasons for this poll. not to debunk your claims or make you look stupid but so we can actually have an idea of the real picture, and the next time you wont have to make a wild guess as to percentages of oc'ers, and up until now the rebuttles to these kind of claims were based upon as much evidence as the claims themselves. with many saying only the hardcore overclock.
I think you are talking about me (http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1660), but tell me if I'm wrong, I will immediatly apologize and delete this post
this wasn't the only reason for the poll, but it was a biggy.
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
Performance boost is really noticeable, specially psx4m games really need OC. Also some rmvb videos.
Linux Registered User # 492214
http://counter.li.org/
------------------------
N900 registered as Linux Machine # 426325