Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#11
nokia is a dumbphone company. Nobady likes them but they dont care...
 
atilla's Avatar
Posts: 1,210 | Thanked: 597 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ hamburg,germany
#12
_________________________________
Attached Images
 
__________________


Nobody likes us but we dont care....
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to atilla For This Useful Post:
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#13
great thread. keep em coming
 
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Dec 2010
#14
slender, thanks for a link to post by quole, this was informative reading.

jakiman, I'm talking about hardware-accelerated flash videos, not version spoofing.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#15
Wow. This went downhill in record time.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Posts: 343 | Thanked: 165 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#16
Lotta *******s hit this thread hard, anyway, I completely agree with the original poster.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mattbutsko For This Useful Post:
cfh11's Avatar
Posts: 1,062 | Thanked: 961 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Boston, MA
#17
Originally Posted by Borgia View Post
Adobe has showed fully hardware accelerated Flash Player 10.1 running on Nokia N900 on October 05, 2009.

Since then, Texas Instruments has even published optimized for ARM Cortex-A8 Flash 10 binaries on it's website. (Which are not publicly available for download.)

N900 is a great device, but it's Flash support is crap. With Adobe Flash 9, which is the latest available version, I am able to play only about 20% of the flash wideos on the net. I ask myself, why Nokia didn't include Adobe Flash 10.1 in it's recent software updates?

Needless to say, I'm really disappointed by this issue and I can only guess it's cause. I think that when Nokia management decided to abandon ARM platform altogether, they probably didn't want to pay Adobe for it's latest hardware optimizations.

And we, the people who bought N900, are the only one to loose. When I buy flagship device, I expect flagship support, which is definitely not the one I see coming from Nokia.

Since most of the Maemo software is opensource, we can fix lots of the issues on our own, but Adobe Flash is proprietary software, with it we are left to the tender mercies of Nokia and Adobe.

Ironically, current N900 Flash is older and slower than Adobe Flash on Android devices on the same processor. Google probably cares about it's customers a little more.
Ahem, let's attempt to clear up some of the many misconceptions in this post.

1) It is very likely that not only was the fabled Oct 2009 Adobe demo not hardware accelerated (since a hardware accelerated version for ARM still does not exist) it may not have even been Flash 10.

2) The Flash 10 developer plugin from TI is crap. It performs even worse than the version n900 has.

3) I don't know what videos youre watching (p0rn maybe?) but I would say more like 80% work for me with tweakflash set to version 10

4) Nokia has done the exact opposite of abandon ARM

5) It is Adobe's responsibility to make Flash 10 available for ARM Linux, not Nokia.

6) The n900 is NOT a flagship device. It is a niche device, big difference. High specced and high priced != flagship. Flagship is what the company wants be known for in the mass market (think Motorola Droid).
__________________
Want to browse streamlined versions of websites automatically when in 2g? Vote for this brainstorm.

Sick of your cell signal not reconnecting after coming out of a bad signal area? Vote for this bug.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cfh11 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#18
The fact that so many people start similar threads is of course an indication that they are correct -- they represent the honest opinion of the people Nokia sells phones to. It's a shame that Nokia isn't just a dumbphone company, as someone posted above -- it's also a dumb phone company.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#19
Originally Posted by cfh11 View Post
...I don't know what videos youre watching...
Vimeo. Facebook. There are plenty of others that made the switch.

Nokia has done the exact opposite of abandon ARM
They're too busy abandoning Maemo.

It is Adobe's responsibility to make Flash 10 available for ARM Linux, not Nokia.
Disagree. It's up the manufacturer because they'll be the ones supporting it, not Adobe.

The n900 is NOT a flagship device. It is a niche device, big difference. High specced and high priced != flagship. Flagship is what the company wants be known for in the mass market (think Motorola Droid).
But it's also not the lowest spec'd machine either. In fact, it's the only Maemo phone. That may not say "flagship" but it definitely isn't chopped liver.
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#20
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
The fact that so many people start similar threads is of course an indication that they are correct
Or that they are utterly unfamiliar about the processes that result in the software in their hands, being misled by marketing and superficial personal experiences. You know, just like when almost everyone believed and found it very logical to believe that the Earth was at the center of the universe (and flat).
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
fud fud fap fap, not again!


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:23.