Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 58 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#1
As I know, N900 uses a OMAP3 processor. But when I try to find the code of N900 display part, I went into below path and found only two directories related with omap, one is omap, another one is omap2. And in fact this omap2 directory contains the N900 display driver code. Why it is not omap3?
Code:
kernel-2.6.28/drivers/video
And from the link below we can confirm that N900 display's code is really put in omap2 directory.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source...565akm.c?a=arm
 
Posts: 724 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Cambridge, UK
#2
Originally Posted by justforfun View Post
As I know, N900 uses a OMAP3 processor. But when I try to find the code of N900 display part, I went into below path and found only two directories related with omap, one is omap, another one is omap2. And in fact this omap2 directory contains the N900 display driver code. Why it is not omap3?
Code:
kernel-2.6.28/drivers/video
And from the link below we can confirm that N900 display's code is really put in omap2 directory.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source...565akm.c?a=arm
It is an OMAP3 the tech specs aren't exactly hard to come by. Don't get fooled by driver naming. They share the same architecture in those cases.
 
Posts: 58 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#3
Originally Posted by tswindell View Post
It is an OMAP3 the tech specs aren't exactly hard to come by. Don't get fooled by driver naming. They share the same architecture in those cases.
Thank you! I found a good method, it is to to check '.config' file to see whether the corresponding setting is selected or not.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:09.