The Following User Says Thank You to gerdich For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-18
, 17:29
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-18
, 23:16
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 116 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#3
|
|
2010-10-18
, 23:43
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#4
|
With the regular programs you have to choose:
plug the headphones(antenna) or not.
If you plug the hp the transmitter doesn't work.
If you don't the receiver doesn't work.
|
2011-01-21
, 04:47
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#5
|
Both are arbitrary software limitations that can be removed. You can find patched binaries around here for the transmitter that can work with headphones plugged in, and you can manually edit fmradio (the receiver program) source to work without headphones.
Depending on whether you want to have the HP cable plugged in or not you should do one or the another.
I always wanted to file a feature request in fmradio to make the above a gconf option but I tend to forget
|
2011-01-21
, 08:44
|
Posts: 309 |
Thanked: 456 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#6
|
There are people that pretend that it is not possible to use the receiver and the emitter at the same time.
Is that true?
Is that a hardware limitation?
Or is that a kernel limitation?
Or is that a userland limitation?
I can't imagine that this is a hardware limitation, because both (emitter and receiver) are on a different chip.
The only hardware limitation could be the antenna part.
But as I'm experimenting with communication inside the device I don't need an external antenna any way. And the FM-chips have their own internal antenna on the chip.
So: What's the reason, why communication between the FM-Chips should be impossible?