|
2011-02-13
, 21:56
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 197 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#42
|
6:44PM "When you look at all of the value that we're contributing, the value transferred to Nokia is measured in the Bs, not the Ms." That's billions, not millions, folks.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to IsaacDFP For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-13
, 23:01
|
Posts: 185 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#43
|
I'm still trying to figure out this thing. Nokia and Microsoft keep talking like they're the only ones in that "third ecosystem". "We're contributing this and they're contributing that." But in reality there are many other OEMs beside Nokia in the same ecosystem.
Nokia already pays for Microsoft's contribution in the form of licence fees. So do other manufacturers, there seems to be nothing exclusive for Nokia. With the license fee Nokia gets nothing the other ones don't get.
So what will Nokia get from it's contributions or things it gives up? How will they get compensated for contributing maps? What will they get from bringing the carrier billing contracts to the table? Ovi store to be merged with WP market place, do they get revenue from application/content sales on Nokia devices now that they give up their own revenue source? Same with Nokia music? They are giving away both what they have and what they could've had which obviously has to be weighed in when making decisions like this.
Nokia is also bringing it's scale (if there's any left when they start getting devices out especially now that Symbian sales are going to take a hit) that is one of the big things the ecosystem lacks and from which every player in the ecosystem will benefit from. What will Nokia get from bringing all this to the table relative to other manufacturers who don't?
Elop seemed to mention revenue from ads and "substantial monetary value measured in billions, not millions". Is the latter a one-off payment or a steady revenue stream or what? Anything else?
|
2011-02-14
, 05:20
|
Posts: 163 |
Thanked: 256 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#44
|
Nokia got the rights to develop with wp7. Elop said that if they want they could change the whole UI of wp7. I don't the other OEM's can do that
|
2011-02-14
, 08:39
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 104 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Romania
|
#45
|
|
2011-02-14
, 09:39
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#46
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-14
, 09:42
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#47
|
Nokia got the rights to develop with wp7. Elop said that if they want they could change the whole UI of wp7. I don't the other OEM's can do that
|
2011-02-14
, 22:19
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 197 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#48
|
|
2011-02-15
, 22:17
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#49
|
|
2011-02-15
, 22:43
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#50
|
The Following User Says Thank You to phr For This Useful Post: | ||
Nokia already pays for Microsoft's contribution in the form of licence fees. So do other manufacturers, there seems to be nothing exclusive for Nokia. With the license fee Nokia gets nothing the other ones don't get.
So what will Nokia get from it's contributions or things it gives up? How will they get compensated for contributing maps? What will they get from bringing the carrier billing contracts to the table? Ovi store to be merged with WP market place, do they get revenue from application/content sales on Nokia devices now that they give up their own revenue source? Same with Nokia music? They are giving away both what they have and what they could've had which obviously has to be weighed in when making decisions like this.
Nokia is also bringing it's scale (if there's any left when they start getting devices out especially now that Symbian sales are going to take a hit) that is one of the big things the ecosystem lacks and from which every player in the ecosystem will benefit from. What will Nokia get from bringing all this to the table relative to other manufacturers who don't?
Elop seemed to mention revenue from ads and "substantial monetary value measured in billions, not millions". Is the latter a one-off payment or a steady revenue stream or what? Anything else?