![]() |
2011-02-21
, 12:47
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#1611
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 13:06
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#1612
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 13:09
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#1613
|
That's the way of things in computing & programming. You learn one system, then you find that you have to learn a different one. I started out on Informix, then had to learn Sybase and then MS.SQl Server, and then had to learn Oracle. Once you learn the basics of how databases work, how SQL works, and how client-server applications work, you soon learn how to transfer your skills. Ditto with OS's. I had to learn SCO V, then NT3.5 & 4, then Novell Netware, then vanilla SVR4, then Ultrix, OSF & VMS, then HP.UX, then Sun Solaris, then XP, and eventually Linux (Debian & Ubuntu). I learned a few scripting & programming languages along the way - which depended on what the job I was doing required. They are just tools to allow you do a job for somebody, and if the tool you are using isn't doing the job, you learn how to use a new tool. That's life.
Mish.
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 13:18
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#1614
|
Not all coders are technology nymphomaniacs. Some of us have actually found what works best for certain tasks, and stick with it.
I've been using Qt in professional life for maybe 4-5 yrs now, never had to touch .net or microsoft stuff after Qt came out.
It's very simple, choose the wrong toolkit, and you won't find any developers. (or the ones you find, you won't want)
I'm certainly not ever going to code for .net, they had their chance to put Qt and blew it.
It's extremely rude to force people to learn technologies that are INFERIOR.
The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 13:54
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#1615
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 15:21
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#1616
|
You used "extremely rude" in the same sentence with calling other people's choice inferior, in caps, and you didn't even crack a smile?
Cool.
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 16:02
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Holland
|
#1617
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blipnl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 17:40
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Vienna
|
#1618
|
Beautifully said. I think that many arguments here are by bruised European egos that cant stomach the fact that Nokia decided to abandon Symbian for american OS, WP7. Forget about Europe vs. America. NOKIA did the right thing by joining with MS. I bought N8 and I tell you its sitting in my glove compartment. Besides camera its OS is just not good enough to cut it in the competitive market. I also played with WP7, much more fluid, much more responsive than Symbian 3.
This is a win-win for NOKIA. They can still pursue their weegos and meegos and partner with MS that KNOWS how to do software engineering.
And Elop did the timing brilliantly. You dont want to sink with no return. Symbian is destined for history. Sure, masses will still use it for another 5-6 years and you will get your support and so on. But just like any other OS, things change and WP7/8/9/10 will give everyone else run for their money. I would be excited to be at NOKIA know, with new beginning, new cash infusion and ability to work for innovators like MS
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ME2g For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 17:57
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Vienna
|
#1619
|
Yeah, I thought they were a thing of the past after XP.SP2 - but I have seen this several times on my W7 laptop (not the PC though - that just ends up hanging and I have to do a hard reset to clear it).
Mish
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 18:47
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#1620
|
Nope, you said they will produce something people can use within two months. I said they have yet to produce anything people can use.
Hardware vendors dropped the ball? I thought you said they would be the ones who would buy it. And the MSI Wind - didn't they invent the netbook? Seems odd for an OS targeting netbooks to not work on the netbook that started the ball rolling.
I misunderstood - MeeGo is not aimed at users, but hardware vendors. So, it is no use - to me or any other user. Why would I bother with that?
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
bye-nokia, i don't even, just shoot him, just shoot me, let's elope, lockdown, meego?fail, negatron dan, nokia defiled, nokia suicide, sell tulips, step 8 out of 5, the-end?, www.elop.org |
|