Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Moonshine's Avatar
Posts: 469 | Thanked: 88 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montana
#11
Has anyone else even seen this? Maybe I'm missing something here but it looks like you updated an "optional" package that has a bizzarre version number? To me it would seem like the package you updated was corrupted in some way. If it were truely spreading "like a virus" wouldn't there be more reports here, or a bugzilla thread?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Moonshine For This Useful Post:
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#12
Originally Posted by Darius2006 View Post
I am subscribed to maemo-developers list
and maemo-org administrators and maemo project manager nominated by Nokia insist on removing .deb packages, replaying them by direct on-line install procedure.

Calling it a virus is the right name as it spreads from respositories server to a computer of a user. It can spread to many computers crashing many Nokia devices.
No procedure is known to me yet to protect Nokia tablets against crashing by live on-line package installation.
My intention is to request Nokia to let tablet users to access and download .deb packages to memory card and have it/them than installed keeping package source still available against any subsequent check procedure.
As long as maemo packages are and kept under development there is a good practice to have all .deb packages open to verification procedure.
Frankly speaking, I don't prefer automated package updates, loosing control over what I install or is installed on a Nokia tablet
and what can or can't crash it.

There is a number of developers seeing no problem in the above procedure, keen to reflash it over and over again.
But there is still a number of end users showing interest in read-made hardware product for intended use not beta testing.

Buying N95 cell phone or iPod touch I expect to use it immediately and without any problems and expect software installation procedure not to crash any of the both.

Nokia tablet is an excellent product for developers.
Unfortunately is not a read-made final market product as long as a package can crash it making it not unusable.

Ok. I am aware Nokia tablet is a compilation of commercial hardware and open source software applications.
Ok.
But I would expect Nokia to provide customers with the same level of quality service provided by Apple to users of iPod touch.

Especially in Europe, some customers pay a lot of money for a new Nokia tablet, almost as much as a new laptop costs in US.

As no support is provided to Nokia tablet customers by Nokia
I would expect Nokia to sell Nokia tablets in Europe at the same price, Nokia tablet is offered on US market.

I risk my every minute using Nokia tablet, a new update to repositories can crash it and make it useless for my intended use , car navigation or some other use.

As no support is provided by a manufacturer, a user should be given the same rights and privileges any other beta tester deserves.

As maemo.org is already a part of Nokia I would like to have one full-time well-paid officer in charge of maemo.org,
providing on-line support, Q&A support, FAQ support to Nokia tablet customers.

I am really afraid, Nokia has lost control over Nokia tablet project, over repositories, making Nokia tablet a lower-quality product vs. iPod touch by Apple.

So calling respositories update procedure , crashing Nokia tablet as a above described, a virus,
I am calling it virus as it really crashes my Nokia tablet and no support, on-line support, no remedy is provided by Nokia at maemo.org
or has been provided by maemo developers list.

Darius

Um... OK

I'll keep an eye out for that...

Maybe we should avoid trying to install OS2006 packages on our N810's too... Just to be safe.

Last edited by YoDude; 2007-11-15 at 23:19.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post:
Posts: 503 | Thanked: 267 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Helsinki
#13
Darius2006, are you sure that the problem you had was really caused by bad repository or package update and not something like this bug: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2006?

In order to prove your point, you need to find a reliable way to reproduce the problem with repositories and post it somewhere, preferably in maemo bugzilla (you may not have time or desire doing this, but making any conclusions based on unconfirmed facts or pure speculations does not make very much sense either). On the other hand, WLAN driver on Nokia 770 using all official versions of OS2006 firmware has a known reproducible problem which can cause damage similar to what you have described (corrupted files).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Serge For This Useful Post:
Posts: 64 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#14
I agree that the software is not great. But your reasons seem just wrong.

1. You can get debs if you want. They are not hidden. If you have trouble finding them, I'm sure we can help. I agree the package manager GUI could be better. If you sen it in red pill mode, you case get weird results.

2. The one touch install DOES get the deb file and download it. You don't see a deb, but it is there. You can set apt so it will cache the deb files, you can let them fill up your disk if you want.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pauljohn32 For This Useful Post:
technut's Avatar
Posts: 574 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ BC, Canada
#15
If you check Darius2006's history of posting here and in the mail list, you'll see he often goes overboard in his accusations. Too bad, because he may actually have a good point once in a awhile, but it's hard to read past the over-reactions.
 
Posts: 529 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#16
Originally Posted by Serge View Post
Darius2006, are you sure that the problem you had was really caused by bad repository or package update and not something like this bug: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2006?

In order to prove your point, you need to find a reliable way to reproduce the problem with repositories and post it somewhere, preferably in maemo bugzilla (you may not have time or desire doing this, but making any conclusions based on unconfirmed facts or pure speculations does not make very much sense either). On the other hand, WLAN driver on Nokia 770 using all official versions of OS2006 firmware has a known reproducible problem which can cause damage similar to what you have described (corrupted files).
Already posted before and got no solution to a problem.
The only known to me was to reflash it.

http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...er/005448.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...ry/002630.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...st/001823.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...er/002268.html
Generally problem is called
[maemo-users] [maemo-users] broken application manager

Darius
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#17
Virus is still the wrong term, as we all told you the last time you misused it. If you really want to be helpful, Darius, please please PLEASE avoid unnecessarily inflammatory (and dangerously misleading) lingo and stick to specifics. Thanks.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2007-11-15 at 23:58.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#18
-- Generic OMG ITS A VIRUS! reply --

_____ is not a virus, unless it inserts itself into executable code on a system, so that when that code is executed, it replicates the virus to other executable code.
This definition corresponds rather neatly to a biological virus, which inserts it's R/DNA into a living cell, so that when that cell operates on all R/DNA present, it replicates the virus and releases new copies of it.

-- End generic response --

You could call this all sorts of things. Including a virus, if you insist. But to call it a virus is to be simply wrong. If you suspect it is malicious, then you could call it a trojan. If not, then it seems the best term would be "a piece of software that crashes," or perhaps, "a piece of software with a bug."
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#19
Oh, and as I'm sure some of the early OS2008 downloaders have noticed, Application Manager has been improved to where one rotten repository does NOT necessarily wreck an install. The user receives a warning that one or more repositories could not resolve, and if it's still possible, the requested installation proceeds. As it should. As we requested in Bugzilla. As Nokia implemented.

Case closed.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 529 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#20
Originally Posted by technut View Post
If you check Darius2006's history of posting here and in the mail list, you'll see he often goes overboard in his accusations. Too bad, because he may actually have a good point once in a awhile, but it's hard to read past the over-reactions.
Give a solution or just shut up.
Ok. There is a group of about 1000 developers at maemo project.
Ok. Any bug is not a problem for developers.
Bu there is also a number of customers, paying full-price for Nokia tablet, expecting to work smoothly and expecting on-line support provided by a manufacturer.
Your problem is you don't like buyers paying full price and expecting support from a manufacturer.
How Nokia can compete with iPod touch and e3xpect thousands of Nokia tablet on US market, not providing on-line support under Consumers Protection Act ?
Only a small number of buyers, paying reduced price for a Nokia tablet can spend days, weeks, months on developing new features, on reflashing it over and over again, but don't expect other buyers to follow the same procedures.
Paying full price on a free market full of gizmos, final buyers expect to get final products free of bugs, with full support, FAQs, Q&A, on-line/phone support provided by a manufacturer, not third parties like you, showing an interest in providing any assistance or not.

Finally, Nokia tablet is an excellent product, unfortunately market lost due to zero-support provided by a manufacturer.
Maemo.org is for developers, this site is a private website.
A new buyer is lost with his/her new gizmo product crashing from time to time.

______________________________
Already posted before and got no solution to a problem.
The only known to me was to reflash it.

http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...er/005448.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...ry/002630.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...st/001823.html
http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...er/002268.html
Generally problem is called
[maemo-users] [maemo-users] broken application manager

If you know a solution, just give a solution.
None known to me yet.
So insist on maemo respository administrators to maintain all .deb respositories ready for download for security and verification reasons.

Alike problem is with System Monitor Plugin SMP showing wrong wifi transfer stat data, not showing IP address.
Already monitored the above and got no response.

Darius
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40.