|
2011-03-10
, 17:59
|
Posts: 204 |
Thanked: 561 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#22
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to roger_27 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-10
, 19:28
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#23
|
Nope. I was careful to avoid the term competition, as it implies a zero-sum game. That doesn't apply in a case such as this. Plurality can provide choice without being the result of competitive behaviour, and does not preclude co-operation between parties.
Also, capitalism should not be conflated with competition. Modern capitalism involves controlling markets and preventing competition.
|
2011-03-10
, 19:44
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#24
|
Also, capitalism should not be conflated with competition. Modern capitalism involves controlling markets and preventing competition.
'Men of high position are allowed, by a special act of grace, to accomodate their reasoning to the answer they need. Logic is only required in those of lesser rank.' - J K Galbraith
My website
GitHub