Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#1
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03...first_devices/

My initial thought - more than ever, it's important that maemo.org be moving forward with developing open software for mobile devices as a specific long-term objective.
__________________
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation

Last edited by SD69; 2011-03-26 at 12:43.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,680 | Thanked: 3,685 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#2
lol, android blows.
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
 
Posts: 999 | Thanked: 1,117 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ earth?
#3
What's probably really happened is the hardware manufacturers said:


"Waghhh! Cheap chinese manufacturers are using Android on cheap hardware devices and we cannot compete with that.

Waghhh! The android phone marketplace is too competitive and we're having trouble maintaining our hardware sales

Waghhh! We don't want that situation again with the growing tablet market"

Hardware manufacturers wipes snot from noses and then says:

"Wagggh! If you (google) don't do something about it we will take our hardware and go elsewhere"

Google cuddles hardware manufacturers and says:

"There, there. Mummy kiss it better. We will keep the source of the tablet platform to ourselves and you can then play as much as you want.

We'll keep those nasty-wasty cheap hardware manufacturers away form your playpit. If they don't like it they can make their own"



Enter Meego......
__________________
I like cake.

Last edited by johnel; 2011-03-25 at 14:09.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post:
bandora's Avatar
Posts: 1,338 | Thanked: 1,055 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ California, USA / Jordan
#4
AFAIK it's not closed source, it's source code isn't _ready_ to be released to everyone.. idk, oh well COME ON MeeGo!!! Show em how it's done!
__________________
FarahFa.com
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bandora For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,225 | Thanked: 3,822 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Florida
#5
Well, rigt now Android Honeycomb is effectively "closed" source. Doesn't mean it'll stay that well, but even if they open source it, this just reemphasizes all the ways in which it's not truly FOSS - the free bit being the most problematic, since even if their (Google's) rationale is true, what the hell? We're not releasing the source because it's not meant for phone use and dear god someone might chose to stick it on a phone anyway? Wha...? The definition of open isn't just about what you can do with a chunk of code when it's available, but also it's about not making decisions like that for your users.

It's either poorly thought out bs, or it's cover for something else bs.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
dan will be mad, hahahaha


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:35.