JonWW
|
2010-10-21
, 11:20
|
|
Posts: 623 |
Thanked: 289 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#91
|
|
2010-10-21
, 11:22
|
|
Posts: 623 |
Thanked: 289 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#92
|
Instead the service providers will use non-routable (private) addresses (see here for details) internally, then NAT them to a small range of routable addresses.
|
2010-10-21
, 11:31
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#93
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 11:50
|
Posts: 433 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#94
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pigro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-21
, 12:07
|
|
Posts: 623 |
Thanked: 289 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#95
|
|
2010-10-21
, 16:44
|
Posts: 433 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#96
|
|
2010-10-22
, 10:53
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#97
|
|
2010-10-24
, 10:11
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#98
|
|
2010-10-24
, 10:35
|
|
Posts: 253 |
Thanked: 184 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bristol, UK
|
#99
|
|
2010-10-24
, 15:27
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 311 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#100
|
is there an easy way to return to 1:1 zoom? I'd like to not burden the CPU with unnecessary scaling. Screen updates are sometimes slower than with the other VNC client & I wonder if the scaling is the cause.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cpulvermacher For This Useful Post: | ||