![]() |
2008-04-02
, 21:59
|
|
Posts: 1,743 |
Thanked: 1,231 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Twickenham, UK
|
#91
|
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 22:26
|
|
Posts: 772 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
@ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
|
#92
|
AFAIK in Italy they are licensing WiMAX at frequencies of 3.4Ghz, while this WiMAX enabled tablet is set at 2.5Ghz. So I suppose that us, in Italy at least, will be out of luck this round.
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 22:28
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#93
|
If you mean "have to" in the sense of "if you buy a N810WE you are automatically signing up for a service fee"? If it's anything like the GPS service on the N810 (nonWE) (almost pronounces like enui), then no. If you don't want to have WiMAX, and just want a black&amber N810, then you probably wont have to activate the WiMAX service and can use it just like the N810 (nonWE).
If you mean "have to" in the sense of "does WiMAX service cost money, or is it free with my N810WE"? ... I'm quite certain that Sprint doesn't offer XOHM on a charity or non-profit basis. So, yes, you'll have to pay for it in some fashion. :-)
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 22:35
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#94
|
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 22:37
|
Posts: 449 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#95
|
As far as I understand it the WiMAX has a pretty wide range of working frequencies, from 2Ghz up to 66Ghz.
The higher the frequency, the higher the bandwidth, the higher the battery consumption, the lower the penetration...right ?
Anyway, the choice of which frequency a WiMAX enabled device can talk on is a matter of the local government, as far as I can tell.
As usual EU and US looks like are following different paths.
EU is pushing bandwidth, while US penetration/power consumption.
If all I have written is true, then my WiMAX enabled device is already limited to only those countries that licensed the 3.4Ghz frequency and won't let me chat in the US.
The Following User Says Thank You to bac522 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 23:06
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#96
|
Did someone say it was? I just saw where 2.5 was said to be in the UK range...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 23:08
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#97
|
Higher bandwidth just has less ability to penetrate walls, which is why you can hear the bass at 22Hz through the floor, but not the tweeters at 20,000 Hz.
![]() |
2008-04-03
, 00:01
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#98
|
![]() |
2008-04-03
, 01:46
|
Posts: 449 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#99
|
Here I thought that 20 kHz being above the audible range for people over 25 was the reason...
Seriously: You do mean higher frequency, not bandwidth, right?
![]() |
2008-04-03
, 07:16
|
|
Posts: 1,743 |
Thanked: 1,231 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Twickenham, UK
|
#100
|
Note too that Nokia announced only that is was making the N810WE available in the United States, in areas where WiMAX is available.