|
2009-08-28
, 23:28
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#92
|
Because it runs in the background. When I receive a message on BeeJive and I'm on a phone, it tells me what the message is... I switch to BeeJive and use it.
Same for notifications of messages/IM's in Fring and Nimbuzz. It's not multi-tasking as you'll invariably refer back to in the N810 or N900. So instead of centering around that, let's center around what you don't know.
I can, I have, I will receive notifications of messages sent to me when I'm not in an app such as Fring for instance. I will switch to that app, and resume my conversations. And if I miss a phone call to my IPKall account that I use via Nimbuzz or Fring, I will see who's called me, and be able to call them back.
That last part, I particularly do not like. But It does alert me when a phone call is coming in. Is it multi-tasking, we already know that's not the case. But I am not left out of using those apps in a bit of app usability darkness that is so prevalent around here - and so very wrong.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-08-28
, 23:38
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#93
|
Yeah, with the iPhone it's more of a serial tasking (one task at a time). With notifications, you pause/stop/suspend one task to switch to the other. And then back. Though aren't Push notifications reliant soley on Apple's servers?
There is an advantage towards the n900 in that one. You can continue what you were doing while talking on the phone (I do it all the time on my tablet currently). But saying the iPhone's VOIP is useless is a bit unfair and biased.
Battery life however will be the n900's problem. But I prefer that the user has control over that situation rather than Apple's locking it down style and not giving you a choice in the matter.
|
2009-08-28
, 23:38
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#94
|
The way you answer makes it real damn hard to reply to...
How do you transfer files to a phone without bluetooth transfer? Not all phones support that - this isn't exclusive to the iPhone either. To center around one small *** feature is frustrating as hell.
You want OBEX. Great for you.
Is it location aware? It's not Google Maps as in google.com/maps - this is an application that pulls in the apps, and layers on top of it location aware tracking, movement - I can see my car move as I drive on the map (dead serious).
Google maps as you're describing on the N900. Can it do that? Can the N900 say "you're here" and then show me routes? No. I have to tell it, via the browser - which I can also do on the iPhone - where I am, and then where I want to go with zero updates as to where I am.
The iPhone Map app does tell me where I am, where I'm going, what is North/South, and directions therein.
I've yet to hit a place without coverage... and I'm in a pretty damn remote area myself. So... until then... I can't answer your question. It would be the same if you're in an area that's a GPS deadspot. They also exist.
I hate to be rude, but are you being intentionally dense here?
How about this. You're describing voice. I'm describing data. I already know people can hear me on the phone.
I don't think [b]you get what I'm saying[b]... I can't download a damn thing on those frequencies. I'm totally against going to T-Mobile, I can't use the data, nor will I switch to EDGE. I can't get more clear than that. Face it, you are locked into a frequency that nobody else in the US uses but T-Mobile.
AT&T 850/1900/2100
T-Mobile 1700/2100
Sprint 850
Verizon 850
Now... let's see. 3 of them have 850. One has 1700, one has 1900. Two have 2100 - I might be wrong about AT&T rolling out 2100, but I swear they inherited some areas that were 2100 from some dealings with Suncom, who T-Mobile bought a year or so ago.
With that, the overlap is minimum whereas in Europe, it's 1900/2100 for the most part.
Now... with that out there... how in the living hell do I take a phone that's made for only T-Mobile work on the AT&T frequencies when I refuse to (yet another stupid US carrier decision) pay for early disconnect and I'm in an area where T-Mobile coverage is utterly non-existent.
|
2009-08-28
, 23:50
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#95
|
|
2009-08-29
, 00:23
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#96
|
|
2009-08-29
, 00:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#97
|
|
2009-08-29
, 00:47
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#98
|
|
2009-08-29
, 00:50
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 65 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Indiana
|
#99
|
|
2009-08-29
, 01:01
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#100
|
How do you transfer files to a phone without bluetooth transfer? Not all phones support that
Is it location aware? It's not Google Maps as in google.com/maps - this is an application that pulls in the apps, and layers on top of it location aware tracking, movement - I can see my car move as I drive on the map (dead serious).
Google maps as you're describing on the N900. Can it do that? Can the N900 say "you're here" and then show me routes? No. I have to tell it, via the browser - which I can also do on the iPhone - where I am, and then where I want to go with zero updates as to where I am.
I might be wrong about AT&T rolling out 2100, but I swear they inherited some areas that were 2100 from some dealings with Suncom, who T-Mobile bought a year or so ago.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to christexaport For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
comparison, iphone, look! a, n00 idiot, n900, n900 v. iphone war |
|
You want OBEX. Great for you.
Google maps as you're describing on the N900. Can it do that? Can the N900 say "you're here" and then show me routes? No. I have to tell it, via the browser - which I can also do on the iPhone - where I am, and then where I want to go with zero updates as to where I am.
The iPhone Map app does tell me where I am, where I'm going, what is North/South, and directions therein.
I've yet to hit a place without coverage... and I'm in a pretty damn remote area myself. So... until then... I can't answer your question. It would be the same if you're in an area that's a GPS deadspot. They also exist.
How about this. You're describing voice. I'm describing data. I already know people can hear me on the phone.
I don't think [b]you get what I'm saying[b]... I can't download a damn thing on those frequencies. I'm totally against going to T-Mobile, I can't use the data, nor will I switch to EDGE. I can't get more clear than that. Face it, you are locked into a frequency that nobody else in the US uses but T-Mobile.
AT&T 850/1900/2100
T-Mobile 1700/2100
Sprint 850
Verizon 850
Now... let's see. 3 of them have 850. One has 1700, one has 1900. Two have 2100 - I might be wrong about AT&T rolling out 2100, but I swear they inherited some areas that were 2100 from some dealings with Suncom, who T-Mobile bought a year or so ago.
With that, the overlap is minimum whereas in Europe, it's 1900/2100 for the most part.
Now... with that out there... how in the living hell do I take a phone that's made for only T-Mobile work on the AT&T frequencies when I refuse to (yet another stupid US carrier decision) pay for early disconnect and I'm in an area where T-Mobile coverage is utterly non-existent.