Laughing Man
|
2009-09-22
, 15:22
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#91
|
|
2009-09-23
, 09:29
|
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Melbourne
|
#92
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BaKSo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 09:42
|
Posts: 547 |
Thanked: 1,383 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Stockholm, Sweden
|
#93
|
Imho, if you're going to talk about the performance of a device before the latest hw and/or sw is released, then it should be stated thusly. As I read (and I could be wrong), everything that Eldar is saying is in the spirit of "this is how your experience will be." That is just not true -- especially when referring to a device that was (a) stolen, (b) an early prototype, and (c) running an outdated sw update.
Tim
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to frals For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 09:45
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#94
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ragnar For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-26
, 07:29
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#96
|
Really, I don't know all the details but he clearly has issues with his whatever prototype and software and the combination of those. It's a strange feeling to have the same device on my hands and not seeing the same issues. The n900 browser is pretty solid currently.