The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to iDont For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 13:14
|
Banned |
Posts: 358 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#92
|
I'm not interested in vanilla kernel-power and, if I'm thinking about the same patch as you do, the patch won't work for kernel-bfs (as BFS doesn't support cgroups). I even doubt whether the patch will help kernel-power because of the way Nokia configured Maemo.
All the features from kernel-power are also to be found in kernel-bfs (which include those you've named with the exception of the injection drivers, which aren't part of kernel-power either). F-cam drivers can be found on the garage page of kernel-bfs as well.
As of now, kernel-bfs is a niche project; those who actively want to use it most likely will use it, but the vast majority sticks to the vanilla kernel(-power).
Please read up on Con Kolivas. Also, use whatever you think suits you the best
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 13:23
|
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Genova (Italy)
|
#93
|
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 13:32
|
Banned |
Posts: 358 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#94
|
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 13:45
|
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Genova (Italy)
|
#95
|
dude, what is the difference between the wonder-patch and bfs? and about con he is a dr. med. he is not even a dr. math or dr. informatic. it is his hobby!
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 13:49
|
Banned |
Posts: 358 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#96
|
I'm not a kernel expert, so I don't know(do you?)
I just think that is not so nice to ctiticise other's work only because you wanted something else. If you want wonder-patch so much, I think you should try to apply it to power kernel by yourself instead of keep asking...
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 18:15
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#97
|
yes i want it very much also bfs cannot hurt so plz patch kernel-power with it. it would be awesome. also there is compcache a nice patch too. I want it too.
The Following User Says Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 22:12
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#98
|
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 22:22
|
Banned |
Posts: 358 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#99
|
What's your point? The maintainer of the linux kernel scheduler (Ingo Molnar) used the ideas (albeit not the code) from his earlier work to write the CFS scheduler for the kernel. And it seemed to me the reasons that Con's actual work wasn't accepted into the kernel were political more than anything else. Just because he didn't study it at Uni doesn't mean he is clueless in this field.
![]() |
2011-01-20
, 23:27
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#100
|
My point is I'm new to this device I have already ported my tune-up script from my router and other linux box and I have just compiled read-ahead so that I can modify this parameter of my device and it is feeling great and I believe it is more respnsive but I met here a lot of ppl who think of themself higher then the rest but when I asked they don't answer to me or doesn't take me serious. Also with my new read-ahead it is feeling great and I think I don't need to move swapspace to microsd!!
As of now, kernel-bfs is a niche project; those who actively want to use it most likely will use it, but the vast majority sticks to the vanilla kernel(-power).