![]() |
2011-04-03
, 13:20
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 219 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#92
|
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 13:22
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 219 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#93
|
If you're going to ask for forum or rule changes, start by abiding by the rules. See http://talk.maemo.org/faq.php?faq=vb...q_tmorulestext - Foul language. Note the part about changing spelling and/or language to avoid the filter.
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 13:38
|
Posts: 724 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#94
|
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 13:43
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 219 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#95
|
I have your solution.
Make tagging available to people with high post-to thanks ratio. Whether this is fixed or not, it's debatable. Keep it at 1:2 ratio or so.
On the funny side, I vote we keep ratio to just one over abill's ratio.
And no, it's not free speech. If insulting is against rules it's against rules on all mediums. What next, I can insult people via text files attached?
Frankly, IMO, we need this fixed because it is a nuissance. "Don't read it" is not an answer, because, frankly, I could tell you to go jump, and add a disclamer.
Disclamers don't excuse any behavior, as we all know. I understand that moderation here is hard already, but let (some of us) help.
Several options:
* allow people who can tag to untag.
* restrict tagging to better users.
* restrict tags (but terrorists win)
* implement a vote down window, where people can disagree with tags. 3 votes de-tags. I will take some time to clean it up.
OTOH, a similar problem is haunting the thanks system and the rating system, to a lesser degree.
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 14:11
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#96
|
to be honest, you're more of a problem than bogus tags. If you don't like what the tags say don't read them. Just like if you don't like what someone says either ignore it or don't. I think you're all making a serious issue out of nothing. Tags in forums are useless unless there is a strict scheme on using them, which is why they should be ignored.
Anyone with half a brain understood what kangal was saying, except you. And you jumped on him straight away like an angry dwarf. You're at least 25.2% more offensive than anyone else on the forum and you never say anything interesting. You just argue with people. Get a grip!
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 14:36
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 219 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#97
|
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 14:45
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#98
|
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 14:45
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#99
|
![]() |
2011-04-03
, 14:51
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#100
|
It took two and a half pages of this off-topic discussion for you to realise that it was going off-topic. And you are as much to blame as the others for this, if you had ignored the posts against you it wouldn't have carried on, and if you want to respond you can do it privately as a PM, but if someone winds you up, the best thing to do is ignore it and move on, this is a lot easier to do online than some real life situations. This sort of off-topic arguing is far more disruptive than any tags. And back on topic, if you don't like them ignore them, I've never tagged any threads and they are so easy to ignore I can go through 10 pages of a thread and not notice a single tag.
![]() |
Tags |
tag abuse, tag system, tagging |
|
THIS NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT BY A MODERATOR NOW.