tenkom
|
2013-09-14
, 17:58
|
Posts: 37 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Norway
|
#91
|
|
2013-09-24
, 18:43
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#92
|
Anyone who prefer an n900 over a decent modern Android phone for anything other than nostalgic reason is a complete fanboy, maybe even slightly insane.
The n900 is just too slow in almost everything. And I know some of you will argue that if it had quad cores and 2GBs of ram it would be fast too... Well it doesn't.
I was able to load theverge mobile site, scroll down and hit "full site", load that and reload SIX times before the n900 was able to load the full site once, on my iphone 5. And I imagine a modern android phone will be just as fast.
Not to mention the terrible battery life, bad camera, low quality lcd, resistive touch screen and chunkiness.
The world has simply passed the n900 by, sadly. I did love it back in 2009.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dylanemcgregor For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-09-24
, 19:57
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#93
|
Anyone who prefer an n900 over a decent modern Android phone for anything other than nostalgic reason is a complete fanboy, maybe even slightly insane.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-09-24
, 20:23
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 285 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Poland
|
#94
|
The Following User Says Thank You to szymeczek34 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-09-30
, 03:31
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#95
|
oh, about bb10, I was expecting something different, more harmattan like and faster. And that lock button on top, it killed it.
|
2013-09-30
, 05:03
|
Posts: 184 |
Thanked: 204 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#96
|